BAPTIST HEALTH V. MURPHY

Docket NumberNo. 09-1070
Decision Date30 September 2010

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
79 cases
  • J.D. Fields & Co. v. Steel
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas
    • 30 Septiembre 2013
    ...or expectancy; and (4) resultant damage to the party whose relationship or expectancy has been disrupted. Baptist Health v. Murphy, 2010 Ark. 358, at 15, 373 S.W.3d 269, 281 (2010); see Robertson Oil Co., Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 871 F.2d 1368, 1372 (8th Cir.1989); 1 Arkansas Law Of ......
  • Orr v. Hudson
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 9 Diciembre 2010
    ...935 (1985). Res judicata consists of two facets, one being claim preclusion and the other issue preclusion. See Baptist Health v. Murphy, 2010 Ark. 358, 373 S.W.3d 269. Under claim preclusion, a valid and final judgment rendered on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction bars anothe......
  • Gooch v. Life Investors Ins. Co. of America
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 16 Marzo 2012
    ...same claim or cause of action; and (5) both suits involve the same parties or their privies.Baptist Health v. Murphy, 2010 Ark. 358, ––– S.W.3d ––––, 2010 WL 3835844, at *7–8 (Ark. Nov. 11, 2010). When state and federal cases percolate “simultaneously ... the first forum to dispose of the c......
  • Stokes v. Stokes
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 28 Abril 2016
    ...it is reserved to those cases where the right to a jury trial existed when the Arkansas Constitution was framed. See Baptist Health v. Murphy, 2010 Ark. 358, 373 S.W.3d 269. The constitutional right to a jury trial does not extend to a case in equity. S. Farm Bur. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Tallant, ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • State Consumer Protection Laws
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Consumer Protection Law Developments (Second) - Volume II
    • 2 Febrero 2016
    ...than actual damage, but did not further elaborate on the difference between the two distinct phrases. 348. Baptist Health v. Murphy, 373 S.W.3d 269, 289 (Ark. 2010). 349. Civil Serv. Comm’n of Van Buren v. Matlock, 168 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Ark. 1943). 350. ARK.CODE ANN. § 4-88-113(1). 351. Arka......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Consumer Protection Law Developments (Second) - Volume II
    • 2 Febrero 2016
    ...Imps., 917 N.E.2d 207 (Mass. App. Ct. 2009), 936 Baptist Health v. Murphy, 226 S.W.3d 800 (Ark. 2006), 749 Baptist Health v. Murphy, 373 S.W.3d 269 (Ark. 2010), 755 Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 634 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006), 764 Barnette v. Brook Road, Inc., 429 F. Supp. 2d ......