Bar Ass'n of Baltimore City v. Snyder
| Decision Date | 03 February 1975 |
| Parties | The BAR ASSOCIATION OF BALTIMORE CITY v. Alvin I. SNYDER. Misc. (Subtitle BV) 3. |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Martin B. Greenfeld, Baltimore, for Alvin I. Snyder.
Francis J. Gorman, Baltimore, for Bar Association.
Argued before SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and O'DONNELL, JJ.
In October, 1971, Alvin I. Snyder, former president and chairman of the board of Uptown Federal Savings and Loan Association (Uptown) and a member of the Maryland bar since 1950, was indicted under a four count indictment, returned by the grand jury to the United States DistrictCourt for the District of Maryland. He entered pleas of nolo contendere to counts two and four, which had charged him respectively with violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1006 (1961) and 2 (1951) (receiving money from a federal savings and loan association with intent to defraud; aiding and abetting) and of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (1948) and 2 (1951) (making a false statement of material fact in a statement to a government agency, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board; aiding and abetting). Snyder was fined $10,000.00.
On 30 May 1974, The Bar Association of Baltimore City filed in this Court a petition charging Snyder with professional misconduct and seeking disciplinary action. We referred the petition, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV36, to a panel of three judges of the Eighth Judicial Circuit, Judges Charles D. Harris, J. Harold Grady and David Ross, for hearing and recommendation.
The matter came on for hearing on a stipulation of facts, supplemented by Snyder's testimony, which can be briefly summarized. Our usury law, Maryland Code (1957, 1972 Repl.Vol.) Art. 49, §§ 1-11 was substantially revised by Chapter 453 of the Laws of 1968, effective 1 July 1968. Particularly significant is the definition of interest contained in § 1 and the establishment of a maximum interest rate of 8% by § 3. 1 After our decision in B. F. Saul Co. v. West End Park, 250 Md. 707, 727-728, 246 A.2d 591, 603-604 (1968), holding that fees and charges retained by the lender must be included in the computation putation of the rate of interest, it was no longer possible for Uptown Federal to retain charges made for credit reports and appraisals in cases where a borrower was being charged 8% interest.
Snyder, as president and chairman of the board of Uptown; Joseph Sussman and David Janofsky, vice presidents of Uptown, and Martin Gilbert, Uptown's secretary, arranged to route fees charged for appraisals and credit reports required for certain loans to Perry Klein Associates, Inc. (Klein), a real estate company. 2 Borrowers were charged sums ranging from $60.00 to $85.00 for appraisals and credit reports, and made their checks payable to Klein. Klein would then order a credit report at an average cost of $7.50 and arrange for an appraisal at an average cost of $40.00. It retained a fee of $2.00, later increased to $3.00 for each application, and accumulated the balance which was to be divided as follows: Snyder, 75%; Sussman, 15%; Janofsky and Gilbert, 5% each. In December, 1968, $7,500 was divided in this fashion and an additional amount of $9,478.00 was disbursed in December, 1969. Snyder's share was paid by Klein, at Snyder's direction, to Snyder's brother. The receipt of these payments was not disclosed to the other directors, nor was there a disclosure on the officer's questionnaire Snyder was required to submit annually in connection with Federal Home Loan Bank Board examinations.
After an evidentiary hearing at which Snyder was the only witness, it was the unanimous recommendation of the threejudge panel that Snyder be disbarred.
The case came before us on Snyder's exceptions to the panel's memorandum and recommendation, principally...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Walman
...Hirsch, 274 Md. 368, 377, 335 A.2d 108, cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1012, 95 S.Ct. 2638, 45 L.Ed.2d 676 (1975); Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. Snyder, 273 Md. 534, 536, 331 A.2d 47 (1975); Maryland St. Bar Ass'n v. Callanan, 271 Md. 554, 556, 318 A.2d 809 (1974), it first becomes necessary for us t......
-
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Kahn
...it cannot thereby be concluded that he did not personally gain as a result of his misconduct. See, e. g., Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. Snyder, 273 Md. 534, 537, 331 A.2d 47 (1975). The evidence shows that as time progressed Kahn became more deeply involved in Berman's illegal activities and ......
-
Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Deutsch
...the commission of the crime. See Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. Siegel, 275 Md. 521, 340 A.2d 710 (1975); Bar Ass'n of Balto. City v. Snyder, 273 Md. 534, 331 A.2d 47 (1975); Rule BV10 e1. Deutsch's conduct, established by admission as opposed to conviction, is no different. Bar Counsel's exce......
-
Searcy v. State Bar of Texas
...281 Md. 152, 379 A.2d 159 (1977); Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Reamer, 281 Md. 323, 379 A.2d 171 (1977); Bar Ass'n of Baltimore City v. Snyder, 273 Md. 534, 331 A.2d 47 (1975). We reject appellant's contention that the felony of which appellant was convicted does not involve moral Appellant......