Barajas-Dias v. Quintana, 021809 FED5, 08-40167
|Opinion Judge:||PER CURIAM:|
|Party Name:||EMILIANO BARAJAS-DIAS Petitioner-Appellant v. FRANCISCO QUINTANA, Warden Respondent-Appellee|
|Judge Panel:||Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.|
|Case Date:||February 18, 2009|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07-CV-585.
Emiliano Barajas-Dias (Barajas), federal prisoner # 08627-085, has appealed the district court's order dismissing his application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1997 conviction of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise. Barajas contends that he has suffered a miscarriage of justice because he is actually innocent in light of Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 815 (1999), and that the district court erred in refusing to permit him to assert his Richardson claim in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 proceeding under the Savings Clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e).
Barajas asserted his Richardson claim previously in a motion under § 2255. United States v. Barajas-Diaz, 313 F.3d 1242, 1245-49 (10th Cir. 2002). Thus, the claim was not foreclosed at the time Barajas filed his § 2255 motion, and the district court did not err in determ ining that Barajas's Richardson claim may not now...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP