Barber v. Bradley
| Docket Number | 2014-SC-000424-DG |
| Decision Date | 15 December 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
43 cases
-
Ellington v. Becraft
...the appellate court's role is confined to determining whether those facts support the trial judge's legal conclusion." Barber v. Bradley, 505 S.W.3d 749, 754 (Ky. 2016) (quoting Commonwealth v. Deloney, 20 S.W.3d 471, 473-74 (Ky. 2000) ). In this review of legal conclusions, we conduct a de......
-
Normandin v. Normandin
...classification of property is a statutory conclusion of law which we review de novo.).3 Kentucky Revised Statute.4 Barber v. Bradley , 505 S.W.3d 749, 754 (Ky. 2016).5 Smith , 235 S.W.3d at 6.6 Stipp v. St. Charles , 291 S.W.3d 720, 727 (Ky. App. 2009) (reviewing maintenance); Downing v. Do......
-
Risner v. McCarty
...trust existed between the parties as Risner argued. This appeal now follows. Our standard of review is set forth in Barber v. Bradley, 505 S.W.3d 749, 754 (Ky. 2016), as follows:As this is an appeal from a bench trial, our standard of review is set forth in Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure ......
-
Simpson v. Wethington
...to factual findings, "appellate review of legal determinations and conclusions from a bench trial is de novo. " Barber v. Bradley , 505 S.W.3d 749, 754 (Ky. 2016).III. AnalysisA. The Rule Against Fraudulent Deprivation of Dower A widow4 has an absolute estate to one-half of the personalty o......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Review of the Year 2016 in Family Law: Case Digests
...property account constitute a Category 3 marital partnership property, for which the spouse is to be repaid. Kentucky. Barber v. Bradley , 505 S.W.3d 749 (Ky. 2016). The equity in the home was marital property and should be subject to equitable distribution. It also held that a random draw ......
