Barber v. Vaccaro
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Citation | Barber v. Vaccaro, 111 A.2d 807, 17 N.J. 523 (N.J. 1955) |
| Decision Date | 28 February 1955 |
| Parties | Archie BARBER, plaintiff-respondent, v. Arthur A. VACCARO, defendant-petitioner. |
On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division.
See same case below: 32 N.J.Super. 573, 108 A.2d 869.
Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, Newark, for the petitioner.
Warren & Stein, Trenton, for the respondent.
Denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Gaido v. Weiser
...79 N.J. 275, 398 A.2d 1283 (1979); Barber v. Vaccaro, 32 N.J.Super. 573, 577-578, 108 A.2d 869 (App.Div.1954), certif. den. 17 N.J. 523, 111 A.2d 807 (1955). Stated simply, based on a careful review of the record, we are convinced that the jury verdict was not a miscarriage of justice under......
-
McDonald v. Mianecki
...tribunal will not disturb that finding. Barber v. Vaccaro, 32 N.J.Super. 573, 577-578, 108 A.2d 869 (App.Div.1954), certif. den. 17 N.J. 523, 111 A.2d 807 (1955). We have determined that the purchasers' cause of action is based on a breach of implied warranty arising out of their agreement.......
-
Kovacs v. Everett
...& Co., 8 N.J. 602, 86 A.2d 585 (1952); Barber v. Vaccaro, 32 N.J.Super. 573, 108 A.2d 869 (App.Div.1954), certification denied, 17 N.J. 523, 111 A.2d 807 The action of the jury in returning a verdict against plaintiff passenger while finding both drivers negligent carries with it the obviou......
-
Valls v. Paramus Bathing Beach, Inc.
...19 N.J. 166, 115 A.2d 553 (1955); Barber v. Vaccaro, 32 N.J.Super. 573, 579, 108 A.2d 869 (App.Div.1954), certification denied 17 N.J. 523, 111 A.2d 807 (1955). Upon deliberate consideration of the somewhat divergent representations of the attorneys, the trial judge resolved in the exercise......
Get Started for Free