Barbknecht Firm, P.C. v. Keese (In re Keese)

Decision Date28 February 2021
Docket NumberAdversary No. 18-4057,Case No. 18-40817
PartiesIN RE: HOPE RENEE KEESE xxx-xx-0192 Debtor THE BARBKNECHT FIRM, P.C. Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant v. HOPE RENEE KEESE Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Texas
Chapter 7
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Upon trial of the fourth amended complaint filed by the Plaintiff, The Barbknecht Firm, P.C. seeking to deny the entry of a Chapter 7 discharge in favor of the Debtor-Defendant, Hope Renee Keese, pursuant to 11 U.S.C §§ 727(a)(2)(A) and (a)(2)(B) or, alternatively, seeking a determination of whether an alleged debt owed to it by the Debtor-Defendant should be excepted from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and/or 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4), the Court issues the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. This memorandum disposes of all issues pending before the Court.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The Defendant, Hope Renee Keese, is an individual residing in Plano, Collin County, Texas.1

2. The Plaintiff is a law firm in Plano, Texas, through which Joseph Barbknecht ("Barbknecht") conducts his law practice. Barbknecht is the owner and sole member of such law firm.2

3. Barbknecht has practiced law for more than 36 years and is licensed to practice in three states and the District of Columbia.

4. In February 2016, the Defendant hired the Plaintiff to represent her in a divorce from her ex-husband, Corey Keese.3

5. On or about February 10, 2016, the Defendant and the Plaintiff executed an agreement entitled "Agreement for Employment and Power of Attorney" (the "Original Fee Agreement").4

6. At that time, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff $3,000.00 as a retainer for the Plaintiff's legal services.5 That amount was paid by credit card.

7. The Original Fee Agreement provided, inter alia, that:

(a) attorney time would be billed at rates from $275 to $525 an hour;
(b) Attorney Barbknecht's rate for the matter was going to be $425 per hour;
(c) the $3,000 retainer would be placed in the Plaintiff's trust account and that if the Defendant failed to timely pay an invoice, then the Plaintiff would withdraw money from the retainer to be applied against the outstanding amount;
(d) in the event that the retainer was depleted, the Defendant would be required to restore the retainer to the $3,000 level; and
(e) the Defendant's failure to pay for services rendered would be grounds for the Plaintiff to terminate its representation of her and withdraw as her attorney.6

8. When the Defendant signed the Original Fee Agreement she represented and communicated both verbally and in writing that she would pay the Plaintiff's fees.7

9. The divorce case was initiated in February 2016 in the 470th Judicial District Court of Collin County, Texas, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Hope Renee Keese and Corey Michael Keese, Case No. 470-50864-2016 (the "Divorce Case").8

10. In the initial stages of the divorce case, the parties thought that the divorce case would proceed quickly without a great deal of animosity,9 thereby holding the accrual of fees to a minimum.

11. The first fee invoice from the Plaintiff to the Defendant virtually exhausted the $3,000 retainer.10

12. The second fee invoice from the Plaintiff to the Defendant totaled $9,536.21 and reflected the application of the remaining $196.29 of the retainer and the remainder thereafter remained unpaid by the Defendant.11

13. In fact, the $3,000 initial retainer paid by the Defendant was the only payment that the Defendant ever made to the Plaintiff.12

14. Thus, soon after the Divorce Case was initiated, the Defendant defaulted on her payment obligations to the Plaintiff for accrued attorneys' fees.13

15. In June 2016, the hope for a simpler, friendlier divorce dissipated at a temporary orders hearing when serious accusations regarding misbehavior and parental fitness were made against the Defendant by her husband.

16. This myriad of issues complicated the Divorce Case which increased the number of attorney services required to be rendered. These issues included:

(a) the Defendant's sexual impropriety and her misrepresentations about that issue to her counsel, the Plaintiff;
(b) the Defendant's desire to achieve limited visitation and limited custody rights for her ex-husband;
(c) accusations of adultery by and against the Defendant and her ex-spouse;
(d) false allegations by the Defendant's ex-mother-in-law to the Defendant's employer.14

17. These developments occurred at a time in which the Defendant was already in arrears to the Plaintiff on accrued fees.

18. In response to the payment default, the Plaintiff intended to terminate its representation of the Defendant and withdraw as her attorney of record in the Divorce Case.15

19. The Defendant wanted to retain the Plaintiff as her attorney in the Divorce Case.16

20. In response, beginning around mid-June, 2016, the Plaintiff sought assurances from the Defendant that she would pay its accruing fees and costs in light of the case growing in size and complexity.17

21. The Defendant invited the Plaintiff to rely on the money that she anticipated to receive from the sale of her house and the receipt of a portion of her ex-husband's pension plan as assurance for her ability to pay the Plaintiff's fees and costs.18

22. Barbknecht had previously advised the Defendant in May 2016 that she would likely incur adverse tax consequences should she decide to liquidate any portion of the retirement funds that she might receive from her soon-to-be ex-spouse's pension plan in order to pay expenses.19

23. Barbknecht gave similar advice to the Defendant before she executed the Supplemental Fee Agreement.20

24. When the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff's fees and expenses from the proceeds of her anticipated divorce settlement, such was the only source of funds that she had available to her to pay its fee.21

25. Indeed, the assets designated in the Supplemental Fee Agreement constituted the only source of funds that the Defendant had available to pay the approximate $9,500 that she owed the Plaintiff for accrued fees at the end of June 2016.22

26. The July 27, 2016 invoice illustrated the growing problem. The services billed by the Plaintiff in that month totaled $11,057 and increased the overall accrued fees to $20,593.71.23

27. Accordingly, on or about August 18, 2016, the Defendant and the Plaintiff entered into a supplemental fee agreement (the "Supplemental Fee Agreement"), which acknowledges the Defendant's default under the Fee Agreement and provides the following:

Hope Renee Keese desires that The Barbknecht Firm P.C. continue to represent her through the conclusion of the above-captioned matter. As consideration for doing so Hope Keese agrees that any monies coming to her from any source within this captioned case or from outside the case regardless ofsource will be first applied to the payment of fees, interest, expenses, and costs incurred by The Barbknecht Firm p.c. (sic) in consideration for The Barbknecht Firm P.C. continuing to represent Hope Keese.
Ms. Keese will liquidate any interest she is awarded or becomes entitled to in Mr. Corey Keese's profit sharing pension plan within 5 business days for an award or settlement turning such funds legally over to her and shall pay any and all bills that such amount may cover with the Barbknecht Firm p.c. (sic).
Ms. Keese will pay to The Barbknecht Firm p.c. (sic) first in time, the funds which she receives or is awarded from the sale of 1622 Geneieve (sic) Drive Wylie Tx. 75098 and or funds payable to her from Mr. Corey Keese toward satisfying attorney fees, interest, costs, and expenses in this matter and any other matter for which The Barbknecht Firm pc (sic) Is (sic) her counsel.24

28. By signing the Supplemental Fee Agreement, the Defendant again represented and communicated her intention to pay the Plaintiff's fees.25

29. Throughout the Divorce Case, the Plaintiff generated monthly invoices which itemized attorneys' fees and expenses incurred to date.26

30. The Defendant has admitted her receipt of these invoices as they were generated.27

31. Despite her receipt of those monthly invoices, the Defendant never instructed the Plaintiff to cease its activities or to limit the time that it spent on her case.28

32. Fees continued to accrue at a significant rate. By the end of calendar year 2016, the invoiced amounts totaled over $40,000.29

33. On March 1, 2017, the parties engaged in a successful daylong mediation of the outstanding disputed issues in the Divorce Case, involving significant preparation and participation time by the Plaintiff.30

34. Through April 7, 2017, the attorneys' fees billed by the Plaintiff had risen to $73,751.01.31

35. Significant services were required to be rendered in the succeeding months in attempts to process the mediated settlement into final orders.

36. An Agreed Decree of Divorce was signed in the Divorce Case on May 26, 2017.

37. The Defendant and her ex-spouse subsequently reached an agreement whereby the Defendant would abandon her interest in the homestead in favor of a larger award from her ex-husband's retirement plan.

38. In mid-August 2017, the Defendant convinced the Plaintiff to allow the transfer of the pension plan award directly to her rather than having any portion paid directly to the Plaintiff for its fees or otherwise having the awarded funds paid jointly to both the Defendant and to the Plaintiff.32

39. On August 29, 2017, the presiding judge in the Divorce Case signed an Agreed Order Modifying Agreed Decree of Divorce (the "Modified Divorce Decree") that, among other things, awarded to the Defendant $182,094.00 as her portion of her ex-husband's retirement benefits in the retirement plan sponsored by his employer, Ingersoll-Rand Company.33

40. The presiding judge also signed on August 29, 2017, a First Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order ("QDRO") to facilitate the transfer of the designated Retirement Funds to the Defendant as a...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT