Barker v. Craig
Decision Date | 30 April 1888 |
Parties | BARKER et al. v. CRAIG |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Geo. E. Pritchett, for appellants.
W. J. Connell, for appellee.
The appellants here, Henry O. Jones and John Jort, brought their bill in chancery against Walter Craig, the defendant, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Nebraska. The object of the bill was to remove a cloud upon the title to certain lands. The defendant had brought an action of ejectment to recover their possession, and, having a prima facie title of record upon which he could recover, this bill was filed for the purpose of setting up an equitable defense. Thereupon a temporary injunction was allowed restraining Craig from prosecuting his action of ejectment until the chancery suit was decided. The allegation of the bill was that a deed under which the plaintiff in the ejectment suit asserted title was executed as a mortgage, with a written contract of defeasance when the money loaned should be repaid. To this bill a demurrer was filed, upon which the court made an order in the following language: Afterwards the plaintiff did file an amended bill, to which likewise there was a general demurrer. Upon the hearing of that demurrer the court made the following order: ' ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Republic Natural Gas Co v. State of Oklahoma
...precluded it from being final. Cf. Paducah v. East Tennessee Tel.Co., 229 U.S. 476, 33 S.Ct. 816, 57 L.Ed. 1286; Jones' Adm'r v. Craig, 127 U.S. 213, 8 S.Ct. 1175, 32 L.Ed. 147; Note, 48 Harv.L.Rev. 302, 305—306. Since the judgment now appealed from lacks the necessary finality, we cannot c......
-
United States v. Associated Air Transport, Inc.
...v. Callander, 5 Cir., 256 F.2d 410 and cases cited therein. 6 See e. g., Stratton v. Dewey, 5 Cir., 79 F. 32; Jones' Adm'r v. Craig, 127 U.S. 213, 8 S.Ct. 1175, 32 L.Ed. 147; City of Paducah, Ky., v. East Tenn. Tel. Co., 229 U.S. 476, 33 S.Ct. 816, 57 L.Ed. 1286; Hengesbach v. Hengesbach, 7......
-
Zucker v. Maxicare Health Plans Inc.
...court must still take action; the district court has more to do than simply execute the Judgment. See Jones's Adm'r v. Craig, 127 U.S. 213, 8 S.Ct. 1175, 32 L.Ed. 147 (1888) (dismissing an appeal from a conditional judgment for lack of finality because the record failed to show that the con......
-
Brownson v. United States
...alternative, or anticipatory nisi. Such orders are generally held not appealable. 13 C. J. § 156, pp. 99, 100; Jones' Adm'r v. Craig, 127 U. S. 213, 8 S. Ct. 1175, 32 L. Ed. 147; City of Paducah v. East Tenn., etc., Co., 229 U. S. 476, 33 S. Ct. 816, 57 L. Ed. 1286. And this is especially t......
-
An Analysis of Remittitur's Effects on the Timing to File a Notice of Appeal.
...v. E. Tenn. Tel. Co., 229 U.S. 476, 480 (1913) (dismissing premature appeal and requiring final order to appeal), with Barker v. Craig, 127 U.S. 213, 216 (1888) (remanding case to circuit court due to lack of final order to (56.) See 12 Moore et al., supra note 7, [section][section] 59.52-.......