Barker v. Lane

Decision Date22 July 1901
CitationBarker v. Lane, 23 R.I. 224, 49 A. 963 (R.I. 1901)
PartiesBARKER v. LANE.
CourtRhode Island Supreme Court

Appeal from court of common pleas, Providence county.

Action by Margaret Leach Barker against Edward M. Lane. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. Judgment for defendant.

Charles E. Gorman, for appellant.

Hugh J. Carroll, for appellee.

PER CURIAM. The verdict in this case is clearly against the evidence. Whether the defendant used proper professional skill and diligence in treating the plaintiff's arm was a question which must be determined by the testimony of experts in medicine and surgery. A number of these were called, some by the plaintiff and some by the defendant, and they all substantially agree that the method of treatment adopted by the defendant was professional and proper. Taking their testimony in its strongest light in favor of the plaintiff, it only shows an error of judgment on the part of defendant in treating plaintiff's arm; and such an error, merely, is not enough to sustain an action of this sort. The treatment of which the plaintiff complains occurred in 1892, but no action therefor was brought until 1895. The case has now been tried five times, with varying results; and in 1897 a verdict for the plaintiff...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Telanus v. Simpson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 31, 1928
    ...malpractice cases of this character. Pate v. Dumbald, 250 S.W. 49; Wilt v. McCallum, 253 S.W. 156; Hill v. Jackson, 265 S.W. 859; Barker v. Lane, 23 R.I. 224; Bigney v. Fisher, 26 R.I. 402; Bonnett v. Foote, 47 Colo. 282; Dawson v. Allen, 191 Ill. App. 399; Miller v. Blackburn, 185 S.W. 864......
  • Papke v. Harbert
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • August 15, 2007
    ...treatment based on the information then available to a reasonably prudent doctor in like circumstances." Id. (citing Barker v. Lane, 23 R.I. 224, 49 A. 963 (R.I.1901); Coleman v. McCarthy, 53 R.I. 266, 165 A. 900, 902 (R.I.1933); see also Ouellette, 391 N.W.2d at 816). However, the court ex......
  • Hager v. Clark
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • January 13, 1917
    ... ... negligence, and no recovery can be had. Laymen cannot testify ... on the question of negligence. Baker v. Lane, 23 R ... I. 224, 49 A. 963; Carstens v. Hansleman, 61 Mich ... 426, 1 Am. St. Rep. 606, 28 N.W. 159; Ewing v ... Goode, 78 F. 442; Longfellow ... Means, 82 ... Ill. 379, 25 Am. Rep. 328; 3 Wharton & S. Med. Jur. 501; ... Leighton v. Sargent, 27 N.H. 460, 59 Am. Dec. 388; ... Wood v. Barker, 49 Mich. 295, 13 N.W. 597; ... Wurdemann v. Barnes, 92 Wis. 206, 66 N.W. 111; ... Tomer v. Aiken, 126 Iowa 114, 101 N.W. 769; Van ... Skike v ... ...
  • Telaneus v. Simpson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 31, 1928
    ...malpractice cases of this character. Pate v. Dumbald, 250 S.W. 49; Wilt v. McCallum, 253 S.W. 156; Hill v. Jackson, 265 S.W. 859; Barker v. Lane, 23 R. I. 224; Bigney v. Fisher. 26 R. I. 402; Bonnett v. Foote, 47 Colo. 282; Dawson v. Allen, 191 Ill.App. 399; Miller v. Blackburn, 185 S.W. 86......
  • Get Started for Free