Barker v. Retail Credit Co.

Citation8 Wis.2d 664,100 N.W.2d 391
PartiesZennor C. BARKER, Appellant, v. RETAIL CREDIT CO., a foreign corporation, Respondent.
Decision Date05 January 1960
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin

John J. Byrnes, Elkhorn, for appellant.

Kenney, Korf & Pfeil, Elkhorn, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Justices FAIRCHILD, HALLOWS and DIETERICH are of the opinion that the order should be reversed because they deem the complaint does not allege facts sufficient to establish that the report transmitted to the insurance company is conditionally privileged. This is because there is no allegation that the insurance company had requested the defendant to furnish it with such report. Justices BROADFOOT, BROWN and CURRIE are of the opinion that the complaint does sufficiently allege facts to establish the existence of conditional privilege, and would affirm the order. The court being equally divided, under the applicable rule of the court, the order is affirmed.

The court deems it advisable to state that there is no division of opinion that a report of the nature alleged in the complaint, made by a mercantile agency to an insurance company at the latter's request, is conditionally privileged. 36 Am.Jur., Mercantile Agencies, p. 184, sec. 11, and Annotation entitled, 'Libel and Slander, report of mercantile agency as privileged,' 30 A.L.R.2d 776, 777.

MARTIN, C. J., not participating.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Smith v. Kleynerman
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • March 21, 2017
    ...N.W.2d 784 (1953) (on appeal).44. Mahringer v. Knoeller , 9 Wis.2d 7, 100 N.W.2d 371 (1960) (on appeal).45. Barker v. Retail Credit Co. , 8 Wis.2d 664, 100 N.W.2d 391 (1960) (on appeal).46. Village of Brown Deer v. City of Milwaukee , 16 Wis.2d 206, 114 N.W.2d 493 (1962) (on appeal).47. Sta......
  • Petition of Retailers Commercial Agency, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • May 1, 1961
    ...Inc., 228 S.C. 384, 388, 90 S.E.2d 370; Bradstreet Co. v. Gill, 72 Tex. 115, 119-121, 9 S.W. 753, 2 L.R.A. 405; Barker v. Retail Credit Co., 8 Wis.2d 664, 100 N.W.2d 391; Bradstreet Co. v. Carsley, Montreal L.R. 3 Q.B. 83, 111-114. Robinson v. Dun, 24 Ont.App. 287. Fitzsimons v. Duncan & Ke......
  • Sunward Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • August 2, 1983
    ...& Bradstreet, Inc., 146 F.Supp. 59 (D.Or.1956); Retail Credit Co. v. Garraway, 240 Miss. 230, 126 So.2d 271 (1961); Barker v. Retail Credit Co., 8 Wis.2d 664, 100 N.W.2d 391; Cullum v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 228 S.C. 384, 90 S.E.2d 370 (1955). The question whether credit reporting agencies......
  • Hood v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • December 1, 1971
    ...245 F.2d 775 (2nd Cir. 1957); Petition of Retailers Commercial Agency, 342 Mass. 515, 174 N.E.2d 376 (1961); Barker v. Retail Credit Co., 8 Wis.2d 664, 100 N.W.2d 391 (1960); Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Robinson, 233 Ark. 168, 345 S.W.2d 34 (1961); H. E. Crawford Co. v. Dun & Bradstreet, 241 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT