Barnes' Estate, In re, 51294
Decision Date | 21 September 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 51294,51294 |
Citation | 130 N.W.2d 227,256 Iowa 1043 |
Parties | In the Matter of the ESTATE of Bernard C. BARNES, Deceased. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appellees' Application for Further Clarification of Opinion having been duly considered, there is further deleted from the opinion reported in 128 N.E.2d 188, from lines 11, 12 and 13 from the bottom of the second column on page 195, 'and, when determined, this reversionary interest will pass to the testator's heirs.'
The opinion is further changed by inserting a period following the words 'in reversion' immediately preceding the language hereby deleted, and the following inserted in lieu of the deleted words,
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stonebrook's Estate, In re
...of Artz, 254 Iowa 1064, 1070, 120 N.W.2d 418, 422, and citations; In re Estate of Barnes, 256 Iowa 1043, 1049, 1050, 128 N.W.2d 188, 191, 130 N.W.2d 227; Watson v. Manley, 257 Iowa ---, 130 N.W.2d 693, Many authorities refer to the execution of a codicil as a republication or confirmation o......
-
Bankers Trust Co. v. Allen
...14 N.W.2d 638, 641, 152 A.L.R. 1296, 1301; 95 C.J.S. Wills §§ 591, 592. See also In re Barnes Estate, 256 Iowa ----, 128 N.W.2d 188, 191, 130 N.W.2d 227; In re Estate of Artz, 254 Iowa 1064, 1069-70, 120 N.W.2d 418, 422, and citations. Nor is extrinsic evidence admissible to vary, contradic......
-
Van Hosen v. Bankers Trust Co.
...Thus public policy comes into play. See In re Estate of Barnes, 256 Iowa 1043, 1051, 128 N.W.2d 188, modified on other grounds 130 N.W.2d 227 (1964). It therefore follows, the infinite forfeiture and termination of all pension rights instantly acquired by plaintiff through prior affiliation......
-
Roberts' Estate, In re
...desire by an arbitrary rule or technicality. This we decline to do. In re Estate of Barnes, 256 Iowa 1043, 1055, 128 N.W.2d 188, 194, 130 N.W.2d 227; Schmidt v. Claus, We conclude there is no such inconsistency or repugnancy here as to require a holding that paragraph 4 is void, and that th......