Barnes Hosp. v. Leggett
| Decision Date | 18 January 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 44645,44645 |
| Citation | Barnes Hosp. v. Leggett, 646 S.W.2d 889 (Mo. App. 1983) |
| Parties | BARNES HOSPITAL, a corp., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald A. LEGGETT, Collector of Revenue of the City of St. Louis, et al., Defendant-Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
John L. Davidson, Jr., St. Louis, for plaintiff-appellant.
James J. Wilson, St. Louis, for defendant-respondent.
This appeal by Barnes Hospital involves taxation of Queeny Tower, a 17-story building connected to, used and owned by Barnes Hospital for the tax exempt purposes of treating patients and providing them with care and services. Washington University Medical School, whose teaching facilities are located within the Barnes Hospital complex and whose faculty members comprise the medical staff of the hospital, leases Queeny Tower from Barnes. The part-time faculty subleases offices in Queeny Tower from Washington University for use in their private practice as well as for use in their teaching, research and Barnes Hospital functions.
The City of St. Louis placed Queeny Tower on its assessment rolls for 1978. Barnes Hospital, a not-for-profit corporation, subsequently filed its petition in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis to enjoin the St. Louis City Assessor from placing Queeny Tower on the tax rolls and to enjoin the Collector of Revenue for the City of St. Louis from levying or enforcing tax collection on Queeny Tower for 1978 and subsequent years. After a hearing, the trial court made its findings of facts and conclusions of law in favor of Barnes by decree of August 24, 1978, which enjoined tax assessment or its collection on Queeny Tower. The Collector and Assessor appealed to the Supreme Court which reversed the cause with directions that "a judgment be entered enjoining assessment of those portions of Queeny Tower which meet the Franciscan [566 S.W.2d 213 (Mo.banc 1978) ] test." Barnes v. Leggett, 589 S.W.2d 241, 244 (Mo.banc 1979).
On remand, the trial court conducted three days of hearings, modified its earlier order and entered its judgment in which the trial court permitted the Collector of Revenue and the Assessor of the City of St. Louis:
(1) To assess 16.6% of the buildings of Barnes' property, representing the portion of those buildings occupied by part-time faculty members also engaged in private practice of medicine;
(2) To place those portions of appellant's property on the assessment rolls of the City of St. Louis for the year 1978 for a total assessment of $315,000; and
(3) To levy a tax for compelled payment on these portions.
We reverse.
The sole question raised is whether property owned by a tax exempt hospital and leased to the medical school for use by its faculty may be taxed where its part-time faculty members, also engaged in limited private practice, maintain their offices therein.
The facts are undisputed. We borrow freely from the Supreme Court opinion's recitation of the pertinent facts without the use of quotation marks. Barnes v. Leggett, supra. The Barnes Hospital complex consists of eighteen buildings, some of which are owned by Barnes and some by Washington University. Barnes is an important center for teaching medicine in allied fields. Within the complex, teaching programs are conducted by the Washington University Medical School including hospital administration, nursing programs, practical nursing, dietary internship, anesthesia, pharmacy internship programs and radiology technician programs. Barnes and Washington University have jointly developed a world-famed reputation in medical pedagogy, drawing sick and injured from great distances to benefit from their expertise. All patients in Barnes Hospital may be subjects for instruction of the students of Washington University School of Medicine. The medical staff of the hospital consists solely of the faculty of the School of Medicine. Under the hospital by-laws, a physician's appointment to the medical staff of the hospital ceases when he ceases to be a member of the faculty of the school of medicine.
All the buildings of the Barnes complex are physically connected. Queeny Tower is a seventeen story building connected to a building to the east (Rand-Johnson) and has laboratories, patient care rooms for families, a non-commercial pharmacy, x-ray facilities, hospital offices, a meeting place for the Board, eating facilities, and space for the faculty of Washington University Medical School. Barnes leases 39,989 square feet of space in Queeny Tower to the medical school for which an annual rent is paid constituting less than 0.5% of the total cost of patient care. The medical school in turn subleases a portion to physicians on its part-time faculty to carry on a limited private practice in addition to their responsibility to the university for teaching and research.
On remand, in its findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court found additionally that the office practice of the part-time faculty members is closely integrated with bed-side practice as a role model on patient care. Patient care, instruction of students and the functioning of the clinics for the indigent are materially improved by the presence of part-time doctors in the hospital on a geographically full-time basis. Several highly qualified physician educators testified as expert witnesses that the space-sharing arrangement for the part-time faculty is a necessary concomitant to the hospital's eleemosynary purposes. The heavy load of clinic teaching and patient care falls on the part-time faculty. Without the part-time faculty, Barnes would have to reduce substantially the free clinic work that it does. Its out-patient load exceeds that of St. Louis City Hospital (Starkloff Memorial Hospital), and of both City hospitals before the City closed its Homer G. Phillips Hospital facility. Utilization of the part-time faculty enables the hospital to provide lower cost of care for the indigents within the City. Absent the part-time faculty, Barnes would have to substantially reduce free medical services provided to the City's needy. Equally important is the teaching load of the part-time medical school faculty which is on par with that of the full-time faculty of other departments of the Washington University. In the arrangement where Barnes leases the space to the university, the rent paid to Barnes by the medical school does not yield a corporate profit. Nor does the rent paid by the part-time faculty to the medical school, and, in turn, to Barnes Hospital, generate profit. The hospital sustains a loss.
Both the Missouri Constitution and the Revised Statutes of Missouri require that for property to be exempt, it must be "used exclusively" for exempt purposes. Mo. Const., Art. X, § 6; § 137.100(5) RSMo 1978.
Article X, § 6 of the Constitution of Missouri provides that "all property, real and personal, not held for private or corporate profit and used exclusively ... for purposes purely charitable ... may be exempted from taxation by general law."
Section 137.100(5) RSMo 1978 exempts from taxation, inter alia, "all property, real and personal, actually and regularly used exclusively ... for purposes purely charitable and not held for private or corporate profit...."
In Barnes Hos. v. Leggett, 589 S.W.2d 241 (Mo.banc 1979), the Supreme Court stated that property must meet the following provisions, first enunciated in Franciscan Tertiary Province of Missouri, Inc. v. State Tax Comm'n., ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Wetterau, Inc. v. Director of Revenue
...the "reasonable, natural and practical interpretation in light of modern conditions" is applied to the statute. Barnes Hosp. v. Leggett, 646 S.W.2d 889, 893 (Mo.App.1983). The Administrative Hearing Commission's decision will be affirmed "if [the decision is] supported by the law and compet......
-
Walsworth Pub. Co., Inc. v. Director of Revenue, 78769
...Data Co., 794 S.W.2d at 206; Wetterau, Inc. v. Director of Revenue, 843 S.W.2d 365, 367 (Mo. banc 1992), citing Barnes Hosp. v. Leggett, 646 S.W.2d 889, 893 (Mo.App.1983). In fact, the dictionary definition is broad. Any complaints about its scope should be addressed to the General The dete......
-
Barr v. City Council of City of Chesterfield, 66271
...for charitable purposes even though office space within the hospital was leased to physicians for their private practices. 646 S.W.2d 889, 892-93 (Mo.App.1983). We agree with Plaintiffs that the "serves only" language must be given its plain and ordinary meaning. Suburbia Gardens Nursery, I......
-
Central States Christian Endeavors Ass'n v. Nelson, 77637
...and incidental use." Midwest Bible and Missionary Inst. v. Sestric, 364 Mo. 167, 260 S.W.2d 25, 30 (1953); Barnes Hosp. v. Leggett, 646 S.W.2d 889, 892 (Mo.App.1983); Pentecostal Church of God of America v. Hughlett, 601 S.W.2d 666, 668 (Mo.App.1980); see also, Community Memorial Hosp. v. C......
-
Section 2.36 Qualification for Tax-Exempt Status
...Spillers line of cases noted above and adopts the partial exemption rule. The rule was further clarified in Barnes Hospital v. Leggett, 646 S.W.2d 889 (Mo. App. E.D. 1983). Now, as a result of this case, property may be divided into charitable and noncharitable uses for taxation purposes. 2......
-
Section 7 New Rule?Barnes Hospital v. Leggett
...“a judgment be entered enjoining assessment of those portions of Queeny Tower which meet the Franciscan test.” Barnes Hosp. v. Leggett, 646 S.W.2d 889, 890–91 (Mo. App. E.D. 1983) (Barnes II) (citing Barnes I, 589 S.W.2d at 244) (emphasis added); Franciscan Tertiary Province of Mo., Inc. v.......
-
Section 49 Generally
...of what portion of the building was exclusively used for those purposes. On appeal of the remanded case, in Barnes Hospital v. Leggett, 646 S.W.2d 889 (Mo. App. E.D. 1983) (Barnes II), the Eastern District reversed the circuit court and held that the entire building was exempt from taxation......