Barnes v. Am. Fertilizer Co
Decision Date | 17 December 1925 |
Citation | 130 S.E. 902 |
Parties | BARNES et al. v. AMERICAN FERTILIZER CO. |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
[Ed. Note.—For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Alimony.]
[Ed. Note.—For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Consent Decree.]
Error to Circuit Court, Charlotte County.
Petition for attachment by the American Fertilizer Company against O. O. Barnes, principal defendant, and Laura E. Barnes, codefendant, wherein Laura E. Barnes and others filed a joint petition, claiming interest in property levied on, and praying to be made parties and allowed to defend their title. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Reversed.
George E. Allen, of Victoria, for plaintiffs in error.
J. Kent Early, of Charlotte, and Leake & Buford, of Richmond, for defendant in error.
The material facts of this case, as disclosed by the record, are as follows:
On November 9, 1923, the American Fertilizer Company (defendant in error here) filed its petition for attachment against O. O. Barnes, principal defendant, and Laura E. Barnes, codefendant, alleging a debt to be due said company by O. O. Barnes; that said Barnes is not a resident of the state of Virginia; and that said Laura E. Barnes is indebted to and has in her possession property of O. O. Barnes, real and personal, which is sought to be attached.
A writ of attachment was accordingly issued and levied upon certain real estate situated in the town of Keysville, Va., containing seven acres more or less, together with the improvements thereon. The codefendant, Laura E. Barnes, filed an answer under oath to the petition, denying that she is indebted to or has in her possession any property belonging to O. O. Barnes, and alleging, in addition to other matters, that the property soattached belonged to respondent and her children, L. C. Barnes, Otis Barnes, and Wilmer Barnes, the last two being infants, by virtue of certain decrees entered in a suit for divorce previously pending between said O. O. Barnes and the respondent.
The above-mentioned L. O. Barnes and the infants, Otis Barnes and Wilmer Barnes, by next friend, also filed a joint petition in the proceedings, claiming an interest in the property levied on, upon the same grounds as alleged in the answer of Laura E. Barnes, and praying to be made parties and allowed to defend their title to said property.
It appears from said answer and petition that O. O. Barnes instituted a suit for divorce against his wife, Laura E. Barnes, on July 27, 1921, and, on August 29, 1921, a decree was entered therein settling the property rights between the parties, and awarding the custody of the infant son Wilmer Barnes to the mother; that on October 4, 1921, a second decree was entered in the cause granting O. O. Barnes a divorce a mensa et thoro from Laura E. Barnes, and ratifying in all particulars the provisions of the previous decree as to the property rights and other collateral matters therein adjudicated; that on January 2, 1922, said O. O. Barnes and Laura E. Barnes filed their joint petition in said divorce cause, praying that so much of the decree of October 4, 1921, as granted said husband a divorce from his wife be revoked, and on the same day a decree was entered accordingly.
O. O. Barnes having been proceeded against by order of publication, and failing to appear, all matters of law and fact were submitted to the court, without the intervention of a jury, whereupon the court rendered judgment for the American Fertilizer Company in the sum of $6,075.72, with interest, and further adjudged the property levied on and in dispute to be "the property of O. O. Barnes, subject to the contingent right of dower of the codefendant, Laura E. Barnes, and liable to be subjected to the plaintiff's debt." It is to that judgment this writ of error was awarded.
Certified copies of the decrees and joint petition in the divorce proceedings were exhibited with Mrs. Barnes' answer, and are as follows:
Barnes, Defendant.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Porter v. Com.
... ... Barnes v. American Fert. Co., 144 Va. 692, 705, 130 S.E. 902, 906 (1925). Likewise, any subsequent proceeding based on such a defective judgment is void or ... ...
-
Newman v. Newman
... ... Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond ... March 2, 2004 ... 593 S.E.2d 535 Brian H. Jones (Harris W. Leiner; Barnes & Batzli, P.C., on brief), Chesterfield, for appellant ... No brief or argument for appellee Ellen Renee Newman ... Durrett, 204 Va. 59, 63, 129 S.E.2d 50, 53 (1963) (same); Barnes v. Am. Fertilizer" Co., 144 Va. 692, 720, 130 S.E. 902, 911 (1925) (same); see generally Restatement (Second) of Contracts: Stipulations § 94 (1981) ... \xC2" ... ...
-
In re Com.
... ... '" Singh, 261 Va. at 52, 541 S.E.2d at 551 (quoting Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co., 144 Va. 692, 705, 130 S.E. 902, 906 (1925) (emphasis added)); see also Hicks v. Mellis, 275 Va. 213, 219, 657 S.E.2d ... ...
-
Rodieck v. Rodieck
... ... The same court later reiterated its belief that no such authority existed outside the statute or agreement of the parties. Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co., 144 Va. 692, 130 S.E. 902 (1925) ... Jurisdictions without such statutory authority have denied ... ...