Barnes v. Stephens
Decision Date | 11 February 2016 |
Docket Number | CIVIL ACTION NO. H-15-0815 |
Parties | ANDREW BARNES, TDCJ #1531062, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas |
The petitioner, Andrew Barnes, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to challenge a state court conviction that has resulted in his incarceration by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutions Division("TDCJ").The respondent, William Stephens, has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support ("Motion for Summary Judgment")(Docket EntryNo. 19), along with a copy of the state court record.Barnes has filed a response in opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment("Response")(Docket EntryNo. 26).After considering all of the pleadings, the state court record, and the applicable law, the court will grant respondent's Motion and will dismiss this action for the reasons explained below.
A local grand jury returned an indictment against Barnes in cause number 1179556, charging him with capital murder for killing Robert Jackson by striking him with a baseball bat during the course of either a burglary or a robbery.1Because the State did not seek the death penalty, Barnes faced a mandatory sentence of life without parole if convicted of capital murder as charged in the indictment.2A jury in the 183rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, found Barnes guilty of the lesser-included offense of murder and sentenced him to 40 years' imprisonment in TDCJ.3
On direct appeal Barnes argued that the evidence was factually and legally insufficient to rebut his claim of self-defense.4Barnes also argued that the trial court erred by excluding evidence of the victim's violent character and by admitting prejudicialautopsy photographs.5Barnes argued further that he was denied effective assistance of counsel during voir dire, closing arguments, and the punishment phase of the trial.6The intermediate state court of appeals rejected all of Barnes' arguments and affirmed the conviction after summarizing the evidence at length:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
