Barnes v. Texas
| Decision Date | 08 March 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 346,M,346 |
| Citation | 380 U.S. 253,13 L.Ed.2d 818,85 S.Ct. 942 |
| Parties | Wanda Jean BARNES v. TEXAS. isc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Clyde W. Woody, for petitioner.
Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Charles B. Swanner, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480, 78 S.Ct. 1245, 2 L.Ed.2d 1053; Aguilar v. State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723.
To continue reading
Request your trial
39 cases
-
People v. Sesslin
......State of Texas (1964) 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723, grounded these rights in the Constitution. In that case, which involved a search warrant issued ...United States.' (Id. at 114--115, 84 S.Ct. at 1514.) . In Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818, in a case involving an arrest warrant, the Supreme Court in a per curiam opinion cited ......
-
Eisenhauer v. State
...see also arrest warrant litigation in Barnes v. State, 390 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), reversed and remanded, Barnes v. Texas, 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965), on remand, 390 S.W.2d 270 (Tex.Cr.App.1965).13 Prior to 1965, the statutory provision for a "complaint" suffici......
-
People v. Cressey
...of the United States Supreme Court. (Jaben v. United States (1965) 381 U.S. 214, 85 S.Ct. 1365, 14 L.Ed.2d 345; Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 235, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818; Aguilar v. Texas (1964) 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509; Ker v. California (1963) 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623; Giorde......
-
Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections Butts v. Harrison, s. 48
......'By forbidding a soldier ever to controvert the presumption of non-residence, the Texas Constitution imposes an invidious discrimination in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.' Id., at 96, 85 S.Ct. at 780. And see Louisiana v. United ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Labor Organization Standing to Bring Suit Under Warn
...WARN is unconstitutional. The WARN elephant is in perfect health. NOTES _____________________ Footnotes: 1. 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. 2. 380 U.S. 253 (1965). 3. 29 U.S.C. § 2104(a)(5). 4. In Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150, 152 (1970), the Cou......