Barnes v. Texas, No. 346
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 380 U.S. 253,13 L.Ed.2d 818,85 S.Ct. 942 |
| Parties | Wanda Jean BARNES v. TEXAS. isc |
| Decision Date | 08 March 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 346,M |
v.
TEXAS.
Supreme Court of the United States
Clyde W. Woody, for petitioner.
Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Charles B. Swanner, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480, 78 S.Ct. 1245, 2 L.Ed.2d 1053; Aguilar v. State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723.
To continue reading
Request your trial
39 practice notes
-
People v. Sesslin, Cr. 11519
...enterprise of ferreting out crime,' Giordenello v. United States.' (Id. at 114--115, 84 S.Ct. at 1514.) In Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818, in a case involving an arrest warrant, the Supreme Court in a per curiam opinion cited Giordenello and [68 Cal.2d 424......
-
People v. Cressey, Cr. 13933
...Court. (Jaben v. United States (1965) 381 U.S. 214, 85 S.Ct. 1365, 14 L.Ed.2d 345; Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 235, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818; Aguilar v. Texas (1964) 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509; Ker v. California (1963) 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623; Giordenello v. United States (1958)......
-
Eisenhauer v. State, No. 149-85
...see also arrest warrant litigation in Barnes v. State, 390 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), reversed and remanded, Barnes v. Texas, 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965), on remand, 390 S.W.2d 270 13 Prior to 1965, the statutory provision for a "complaint" sufficient to authorize a......
-
Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections Butts v. Harrison, Nos. 48
...L.Ed. 252, dismissed the complaint. See 240 F.Supp. 270. The cases came here on appeal and we noted probable jurisdiction. 380 U.S. 930, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 819, 382 U.S. 806, 86 S.Ct. 94, 15 L.Ed.2d 57. While the right to vote in federal elections is conferred by Art. I, § 2, of the C......
Request a trial to view additional results
39 cases
-
People v. Sesslin, Cr. 11519
...enterprise of ferreting out crime,' Giordenello v. United States.' (Id. at 114--115, 84 S.Ct. at 1514.) In Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818, in a case involving an arrest warrant, the Supreme Court in a per curiam opinion cited Giordenello and [68 Cal.2d 424......
-
People v. Cressey, Cr. 13933
...Court. (Jaben v. United States (1965) 381 U.S. 214, 85 S.Ct. 1365, 14 L.Ed.2d 345; Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 235, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818; Aguilar v. Texas (1964) 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509; Ker v. California (1963) 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623; Giordenello v. United States (1958)......
-
Eisenhauer v. State, No. 149-85
...see also arrest warrant litigation in Barnes v. State, 390 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), reversed and remanded, Barnes v. Texas, 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965), on remand, 390 S.W.2d 270 13 Prior to 1965, the statutory provision for a "complaint" sufficient to authorize a......
-
Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections Butts v. Harrison, Nos. 48
...L.Ed. 252, dismissed the complaint. See 240 F.Supp. 270. The cases came here on appeal and we noted probable jurisdiction. 380 U.S. 930, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 819, 382 U.S. 806, 86 S.Ct. 94, 15 L.Ed.2d 57. While the right to vote in federal elections is conferred by Art. I, § 2, of the C......
Request a trial to view additional results