Barnes v. Texas, No. 346

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation380 U.S. 253,13 L.Ed.2d 818,85 S.Ct. 942
PartiesWanda Jean BARNES v. TEXAS. isc
Decision Date08 March 1965
Docket NumberNo. 346,M

380 U.S. 253
85 S.Ct. 942
13 L.Ed.2d 818
Wanda Jean BARNES

v.

TEXAS.

No. 346, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 8, 1965

Clyde W. Woody, for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Charles B. Swanner, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480, 78 S.Ct. 1245, 2 L.Ed.2d 1053; Aguilar v. State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723.

To continue reading

Request your trial
39 practice notes
  • People v. Sesslin, Cr. 11519
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • April 10, 1968
    ...enterprise of ferreting out crime,' Giordenello v. United States.' (Id. at 114--115, 84 S.Ct. at 1514.) In Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818, in a case involving an arrest warrant, the Supreme Court in a per curiam opinion cited Giordenello and [68 Cal.2d 424......
  • People v. Cressey, Cr. 13933
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • July 8, 1970
    ...Court. (Jaben v. United States (1965) 381 U.S. 214, 85 S.Ct. 1365, 14 L.Ed.2d 345; Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 235, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818; Aguilar v. Texas (1964) 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509; Ker v. California (1963) 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623; Giordenello v. United States (1958)......
  • Eisenhauer v. State, No. 149-85
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • March 23, 1988
    ...see also arrest warrant litigation in Barnes v. State, 390 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), reversed and remanded, Barnes v. Texas, 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965), on remand, 390 S.W.2d 270 13 Prior to 1965, the statutory provision for a "complaint" sufficient to authorize a......
  • Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections Butts v. Harrison, Nos. 48
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1966
    ...L.Ed. 252, dismissed the complaint. See 240 F.Supp. 270. The cases came here on appeal and we noted probable jurisdiction. 380 U.S. 930, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 819, 382 U.S. 806, 86 S.Ct. 94, 15 L.Ed.2d 57. While the right to vote in federal elections is conferred by Art. I, § 2, of the C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
39 cases
  • People v. Sesslin, Cr. 11519
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • April 10, 1968
    ...enterprise of ferreting out crime,' Giordenello v. United States.' (Id. at 114--115, 84 S.Ct. at 1514.) In Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818, in a case involving an arrest warrant, the Supreme Court in a per curiam opinion cited Giordenello and [68 Cal.2d 424......
  • People v. Cressey, Cr. 13933
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • July 8, 1970
    ...Court. (Jaben v. United States (1965) 381 U.S. 214, 85 S.Ct. 1365, 14 L.Ed.2d 345; Barnes v. Texas (1965) 380 U.S. 235, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818; Aguilar v. Texas (1964) 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509; Ker v. California (1963) 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623; Giordenello v. United States (1958)......
  • Eisenhauer v. State, No. 149-85
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • March 23, 1988
    ...see also arrest warrant litigation in Barnes v. State, 390 S.W.2d 266 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), reversed and remanded, Barnes v. Texas, 380 U.S. 253, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 818 (1965), on remand, 390 S.W.2d 270 13 Prior to 1965, the statutory provision for a "complaint" sufficient to authorize a......
  • Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections Butts v. Harrison, Nos. 48
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1966
    ...L.Ed. 252, dismissed the complaint. See 240 F.Supp. 270. The cases came here on appeal and we noted probable jurisdiction. 380 U.S. 930, 85 S.Ct. 942, 13 L.Ed.2d 819, 382 U.S. 806, 86 S.Ct. 94, 15 L.Ed.2d 57. While the right to vote in federal elections is conferred by Art. I, § 2, of the C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT