Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding and Equipment Co.
Decision Date | 19 October 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 77-941,77-941 |
Parties | J. Richard BARNES, Commissioner of Insurance, State of Colorado, as Receiver for Manufacturers and Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange, a reciprocal exchange, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WACO SCAFFOLDING AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. . II |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
White & Steele, P.C., Robert A. Zupkus, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff-appellant.
Yegge, Hall & Evans, Richard D. Hall, Denver, Colo., for defendant-appellee.
Plaintiff is receiver for Manufacturers and Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange (Manufacturers), which was declared insolvent and placed in receivership after this action was initiated. Plaintiff appeals from a declaratory judgment that defendant Waco Scaffolding and Equipment Company was entitled to the protection provided under its policy of insurance issued by Manufacturers even though Waco delayed giving Manufacturers notice of an accident. We affirm.
The material facts are not in dispute. Waco is in the business of selling, leasing, and servicing construction equipment. On several occasions in 1971, Waco was called to service a hoist being used to carry materials and equipment at a construction site. On December 23, 1971, the hoist fell to the ground causing serious injuries to two construction workers who were riding the hoist. Waco became aware of the accident that day and conducted its own investigation. Believing that it was in no way liable and that no claims would be asserted against it, Waco did not inform Manufacturers of the accident at that time. In January 1974, however, the injured workmen served a summons and complaint on Waco, and Waco then notified Manufacturers of the accident, calling upon the insurance company to defend the suit. Manufacturers subsequently brought this action for declaratory judgment that it owed no duty to defend or insure Waco for the accident because of Waco's failure to give timely notice under the terms of the insurance contract.
Plaintiff contends that the court erred in concluding as a matter of fact or law that Waco's stated belief of non-liability for the accident constituted a sufficient excuse to delay reporting the accident until served in the personal injury suit. We do not agree.
Under the terms of the contract Waco was required to give Manufacturers written notice of an occurrence "as soon as practicable." Failure to notify the insurer within a reasonable time constitutes a breach of contract unless there is a justifiable excuse or extenuating circumstances explaining the delay. Certified Indemnity Co. v. Thun, 165 Colo. 354, 439 P.2d 28 (1968).
There are no Colorado appellate decisions determining whether a reasonable belief of non-liability will excuse delayed notice. In Barclay v. London Guarantee & Accident Co., 46 Colo. 558, 105 P. 865 (1909), our Supreme Court held against the insured for failure to give notice but specifically reserved decision on whether a reasonable construction of the policy excused notice when the insured had no reason to apprehend that a claim would be made.
Courts in other jurisdictions have allowed the excuse of reasonable belief of non-liability when it appears that the insured has exercised a high degree of care and has acted in good faith in coming to that conclusion. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Giroux, 129 Vt. 155, 274 A.2d 487 (1971); Frederick v. John Wood Co., 263 Minn. 101, 116 N.W.2d 88 (1962). See also 8 J. Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice § 4744. The general rule is stated in 44 Am.Jur.2d Insurance § 1474, as follows:
We agree with the general rule and hold that a reasonable construction of the policy excuses delayed notice where the insured has acted as a reasonably...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Great American Ins. Co. v. C. G. Tate Const. Co.
...Company, 223 F.Supp. 953 (N.D.Okl.1963); Hughey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, 30 F.R.D. 508 (Del.1962); Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding & Equip. Co., 589 P.2d 505 (Colo.App.1978); H. H. Hall Construction Company v. Employer's Mut. Liability Ins. Co., 43 Ill.App.2d 62, 193 N.E.2d 51 (1963);......
-
Morris v. Farmers Ins. Exchange
...of its duties, Insurance Company of North America v. Waldroup, 462 F.Supp. 161, 162 (D.Ga.1978); Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding and Equipment Co., 41 Colo.App. 423, 589 P.2d 505, 506 (1978); American Policyholders' Ins. Co. v. Cumberland Cold Storage Co., 373 A.2d 247, 250 (Me.1977); Employers'......
-
Marez v. Dairyland Ins. Co.
... ... Eisen, 475 P.2d 637 (Colo.App.1970); compare, Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding & Equip. Co., 41 Colo.App. 423, 589 P.2d 505 (1979), ... ...
-
Halprin v. Equitable Llife Assur. Soc. of U.S., CIV. Ol-B-1321 (CBS).
...Dr. Halprin cites Holler v. Hawkeye-Sec. Ins. Co., 936 P.2d 601, 604 (Colo.Ct. App.1997) and Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding & Equip. Co., 41 Colo.App. 423, 589 P.2d 505, 507-08 (1978), for the proposition that "Colorado has long held that compliance with insurance policy provisions is subject t......
-
City of Littleton, Wallis, and Insurance For Multi-Year Liability Claims
...v. Esquibel, 607 P.2d 1150, 1152 (1980). Marez v. Daryland Ins. Co., 638 P.2d 286, 290-91 (Colo. 1981); United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Allstate Ins. Co., 662 P.2d 1102, 1104 (Colo. App. 1983). Marez, supra, note 8 at 289-90; Colard v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.......
-
CHAPTER 7 CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE COVERAGE ISSUES
...7-17] claimed. Colard v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 709 P.2d 11 (Colo. App. 1985); Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding & Equipment, 589 P.2d 505 (Colo. App. 1978). Reliance on the advise of counsel is also an excuse which will rectify an untimely notice. Colard v. American Family Mutu......
-
Chapter 14 - § 14.12 • INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR FAULTY RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
...2020).[3317] See Colard v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 709 P.2d 11 (Colo. App. 1985) (no coverage); Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding & Equip. Co., 589 P.2d 505 (Colo. App. 1978) (no liability); see also Hansen v. Barmore, 779 P.2d 1360 (Colo. App. 1989) (noting policy's strict notice requirement ma......
-
Chapter 12 - § 12.2 • LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICIES
...2020).[603] See Colard v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 709 P.2d 11 (Colo. App. 1985) (no coverage); Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding & Equip. Co., 589 P.2d 505 (Colo. App. 1978) (no liability); see also Hansen v. Barmore, 779 P.2d 1360 (Colo. App. 1989) (noting policy's strict notice requirement may......
-
Insurance Coverage Under Cgl Policies for Environmental Liabilities
...9. See, e.g., Colard v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 709 P.2d 11, 15 (Colo.App. 1985); Barnes v. Waco Scaffolding and Equip. Co., 589 P.2d 505, 507 (Colo.App. 1978). 10. Compare, Barnes, supra, note 9 (reasonable belief in nonliability for any damage caused by the occurrence constitutes a......