Barnhart v. Thomas, No. 02-763.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Scalia |
| Citation | 540 U.S. 20 |
| Decision Date | 12 November 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 02-763. |
| Parties | BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY v. THOMAS |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3571 practice notes
-
New Hampshire Lottery Comm'n v. Rosen, No. 19-1835
...immediately follows.’ " Lockhart v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S. Ct. 958, 962, 194 L.Ed.2d 48 (2016) (quoting Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26, 124 S.Ct. 376, 157 L.Ed.2d 333 (2003) ); see also Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 144 (......
-
United States v. White, Criminal Action No. 93-97 (BAH)
...Grecian Magnesite Mining, Indus. & Shipping Co., SA v. Comm'r of IRS , 926 F.3d 819, 824 (D.C. Cir. 2019) ; see also Barnhart v. Thomas , 540 U.S. 20, 26, 124 S.Ct. 376, 157 L.Ed.2d 333 (2003) (applying "the grammatical ‘rule of the last antecedent,’ according to which a limiting clause or ......
-
Hux v. Astrue, Civil Action No. 11 - 1306
...jobs existing in significant numbers in the national economy. §§ 404.1520(f), 404.1560(c), 416.920(f), 416.960(c).Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 24-25, 124 S.Ct. 376, 157 L.Ed.2d 333 (2003)(footnotes omitted). Factual findings pertaining to all steps of the sequential evaluation process a......
-
Paroline v. United States, No. 12–8561.
...clause or phrase ... should ordinarily be read as modifying only the noun or phrase that it immediately follows." Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26, 124 S.Ct. 376, 157 L.Ed.2d 333 (2003). But that rule is "not an absolute and can assuredly be overcome by other indicia of meaning." Ibid. T......
Request a trial to view additional results
3551 cases
-
New Hampshire Lottery Comm'n v. Rosen, No. 19-1835
...immediately follows.’ " Lockhart v. United States, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S. Ct. 958, 962, 194 L.Ed.2d 48 (2016) (quoting Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26, 124 S.Ct. 376, 157 L.Ed.2d 333 (2003) ); see also Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 144 (......
-
Decker v. Nw. Envtl. Def. Ctr., Nos. 11–338
...clause or phrase ... should ordinarily be read as modifying only the noun or phrase that it immediately follows.” Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26, 124 S.Ct. 376, 157 L.Ed.2d 333 (2003). If a statute provides that “it shall be unlawful to possess a grenade launcher, a fully-automatic wea......
-
United States v. White, Criminal Action No. 93-97 (BAH)
...Grecian Magnesite Mining, Indus. & Shipping Co., SA v. Comm'r of IRS , 926 F.3d 819, 824 (D.C. Cir. 2019) ; see also Barnhart v. Thomas , 540 U.S. 20, 26, 124 S.Ct. 376, 157 L.Ed.2d 333 (2003) (applying "the grammatical ‘rule of the last antecedent,’ according to which a limiting clause or ......
-
Hux v. Astrue, Civil Action No. 11 - 1306
...jobs existing in significant numbers in the national economy. §§ 404.1520(f), 404.1560(c), 416.920(f), 416.960(c).Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 24-25, 124 S.Ct. 376, 157 L.Ed.2d 333 (2003)(footnotes omitted). Factual findings pertaining to all steps of the sequential evaluation process a......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Is Administrative Summary Judgment Unlawful?
...a substitute for a summary judgment motion."). (85.) Lockhart v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 958, 962 (2016) (quoting Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26 (2003)); see also id. at 963 ("This Court has applied the rule from our earliest decisions to our more (86.) 5 U.S.C. [section] 706 (2018).......
-
Here, There, and Everywhere: Defining the Boundaries of the 'Schoolhouse Gate' in the Era of Virtual Learning.
...ex rel. Levy, 141 S. Ct. 2038, 2047 (2021). (157.) See Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 482-83 (1965). (158.) Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 24-25 (159.) See infra Table A. (160.) See infra Table B. (161.) See infra Table C. (162.) Wisniewski v. Bd. of Educ. of Weedsport Cent. Sch. ......
-
DICTIONARY DIVING IN THE COURTS: A SHAKY GRAB FOR ORDINARY MEANING.
...236, at 72-78 (discussing various kinds of extratextual information that ordinary readers treat as relevant to interpretive tasks). (246.) 540 U.S. 20 (2003). For an extended discussion of the last-antecedent canon, see Joseph Kimble, The Doctrine of the Last Antecedent, the Example in Barn......
-
BREAKING UP VIA ROBOCALL: WILL THE SUPREME COURT'S CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY DISMANTLE PROTECTIONS UNDER THE TCPA?
...antecedent rule 'is "not an absolute and can assuredly be overcome by other indicia of meaning."'" Id. at 572 (quoting Barnhart v. Thomas, 540 U.S. 20, 26 (2003)). Contra Gadelhak, 950 F.3d at 468 (proposing that the language of the statute is paramount when interpreting its (121) See Ryder......