Barnum v. Lockhart

Decision Date16 March 1915
Citation75 Or. 528,146 P. 975
PartiesBARNUM v. LOCKHART.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Department 1.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Coos County; Robert G. Morrow, Judge.

Action by Guy C. Barnum against Herbert Lockhart. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

This is an action to recover installments alleged to be due upon a contract to purchase real estate. The complaint alleged that on August 14, 1911, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to sell and convey to defendant a tract of land, described in the complaint, for the sum of $20,000, to be paid in installments as follows $1,000 to be paid at the execution of the contract; $1,000 within 90 days; $8,000 within six months; $5,000 on or before August 14, 1912; and $5,000 on or before August 14, 1913 with 6 per cent. interest on deferred payments from date of maturity. There was also a provision for attorney's fees in case of nonperformance by either party. It was further alleged that plaintiff "is ready, able, and willing to fulfill all the terms of said agreement on his part to be kept and performed in full conformity therewith"; that defendant has paid nothing except the first two payments of $1,000 each. Defendant answered, admitting that he entered into the agreement, but denying plaintiff's willingness or ability to perform his part of the contract, and set up the contract in full as an exhibit to the complaint. That part of the contract material to this controversy is as follows:

"Know all men by these presents, that Guy C. Barnum and _____, his wife, the first parties, in consideration of the sum of one thousand ($1,000) dollars cash in hand paid, and in consideration of the payments to be made by Herbert Lockhart as hereinafter stated, do hereby agree to sell and convey unto the said Herbert Lockhart of Marshfield, Oregon, the following described real property, situated in Coos county Oregon, to wit: Beginning at the southwest corner of northwest quarter of southeast quarter of section 11 township 26 south, of range 13 west, Willamette meridian, in Coos county, Oregon, thence north 20 chains; east 20 chains thence south 46 degrees east to low-water line on left bank of Isthmus slough; thence southwesterly along low-water line to a point due east of place of beginning; thence west to place of beginning containing 61.6 acres more or less; said premises being and including all of what is known as Port Barnum and fronting on Isthmus slough, Coos county, Oregon, near Flagstaff in said county; and including all streets, alleys, and other public highways shown on said map. (The plat of said Port Barnum having been heretofore vacated by order of the county court of the state of Oregon for Coos county.) The said Guy C. Barnum does also hereby agree to furnish within thirty days from this date an abstract of title to said premises showing marketable title in himself, and to allow the said Herbert Lockhart a reasonable time in which to examine the said abstract of title. * * * In case the second party, his legal representatives or assigns, shall pay the several sums of money aforesaid punctually, and at the several times above specified; and strictly and literally perform all and singular the agreements and stipulations aforesaid, according to the true intent and tenor thereof, then the said first party will make unto the second party, his heirs or assigns, upon request at Flanagan & Bennett Bank, Marshfield, Oregon, and upon the surrender of this agreement, a deed conveying in fee simple, with the ordinary covenants of warranty; excepting, however, from the operation and subject matter of said covenants the before-mentioned taxes and assessments and all liens and incumbrances created or imposed by said second party or his heirs. But in case the said second party shall fail to make the payments aforesaid, or any of them, punctually and upon the strict terms and at the times specified, without failure or default, the time of payment being declared to be of the essence of this agreement, then the first party shall have the right to declare this agreement null and void; and in such case, all the rights and interests hereby created or then existing in favor of said second party, or derived under this agreement, shall utterly cease and determine, and the premises aforesaid shall revert in said first party, without any right of the said second party of reclamation or compensation for money paid or improvements made, as absolutely, fully, and perfectly as though this agreement had never been made."

The answer further alleged:

"That said Guy C. Barnum is wholly in default as to the terms and provisions of said contract on his part to be performed in this: That said Barnum has failed to furnish an abstract of title to said premises showing a marketable title in himself. That said Barnum did furnish an abstract, but the same did not show a marketable title in said Guy C. Barnum for the following reasons: (a) Page 27 of the abstract of title prepared by the Title Guarantee & Abstract Company for plaintiff, dated August 28, 1911, No. 1760, shows a deed from certain persons claiming to be the heirs of Malinda Davis, deceased. That said deed is defective inasmuch as the interest attempted to be described therein was deeded to one Malinda Davis, and, secondly, the description in said deed according to said abstract is defective inasmuch as it appears therefrom that the closing call of the description is not given, the description in said deed being as follows: 'The undivided 1/12 interest in all the following described lands: Beginning at the S.W. corner of the N.W. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of section 11, Twp. 26 S. of R. 13 W. of Will. Mer., running thence N. 20 chains; thence E. 20 chains; thence S. 46 degrees E. to low-water line of Isthmus slough; thence in a southerly direction along low-water line of said Isthmus slough to a point due E. of the place of beginning, and containing 61 acres in Coos county, Oregon, conveying all interest of, in, or to the described lands inherited by the grantors from Malinda Davis, deceased, and the grantor T. J. Davis conveying and intending to convey his right to the curtesy in the described lands.' (b) That page 18 of said abstract shows an agreement between T. J. Davis and wife and other persons, who as owners of said real property agreed to give and convey to Coos Bay Roseburg Eastern Railway & Navigation Company, a corporation of Oregon, a right of way 100 feet wide through and87 across said lands, which agreement appears to be recorded on page 377 of volume 21 of said records of deeds. That said railroad company now occupies and claims said right of way as owner thereof. (c) That page 49 of said abstract shows a mortgage from plaintiff to one Henry Sengstacken, recorded as of May 9, 1910, on page 386 of volume 25 of Records of Mortgages of Coos County, Oregon, purporting to secure the payment of a note for $8,750, due on or before three years from May 14, 1910, drawing interest at rate of 6 per cent. per annum. That in a continuation or additional abstract prepared by said company, dated April 3, 1913, there appears what purports to be an attempted partial release of said mortgage. That said release is executed by Henry Sengstacken. That no consideration is expressed therein, and therefore, as defendant is advised and believes and therefore alleges, said partial release is defective and not a binding or valid release. That the defendant also alleges that he is informed and believes, and therefore alleges, that at the time of the execution and delivery of said partial release said Henry Sengstacken was not the owner of the mortgage referred to in said partial release, nor of the note thereby secured. * * * And defendant further alleges that at all times since the making of said contract and at the present time he has been and now is ready, willing, and able to fulfill the terms and provisions of said contract on his part to be paid, kept, or performed. That on February 9, 1912, defendant did tender and offer to pay to plaintiff the installment of $8,000 due on or before six months from date of said contract, and which tender is in writing, and a copy of said tender is hereunto annexed, made a part hereof, and marked 'Exhibit B.' * * * That defendant on the 6th day of April, 1912, did also tender and offer to pay to plaintiff the sum of $5,000 due on or before August 14, 1912. That a copy of said tender is hereunto annexed, made a part hereof, and marked 'Exhibit C.' * * * That at the time of making each of said tenders and at all times since, the plaintiff has not been and is not now able to comply with the terms of his contract, and has failed and neglected to comply with the terms of his contract as hereinbefore stated, and the title to said real property as shown by the abstracts submitted to defendant have not shown a marketable title in said Guy C. Barnum. That at the time of the making of said tenders there were two unpaid unsatisfied mortgages against said real property aggregating $10,750, besides interest, and of which was the mortgage to Henry Sengstacken for said sum of $8,750 from which said lands were attempted to be released as aforesaid, and the other for $2,000 in favor of First Trust & Savings Bank of Coos Bay, recorded as of April 13, 1910, on page 316 of volume 25 of Record of Mortgages of said Coos county. That the last-mentioned mortgage has been paid, satisfied, and discharged."

The reply, among other things, admits that the abstract showed a contract between plaintiff's predecessors in interest and the Coos Bay Roseburg Eastern Railway & Navigation Company to a right of way 100 feet wide across the contracted lands, and that the railroad company now occupies and claims it,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Schafroth v. Ross
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 7, 1923
    ... ... Ky.Law Rep. 868; Desvergers v. Willis, 56 Ga. 515, ... 21 Am.Rep. 289; Whitbeck v. Cook, 15 Johns. (N.Y.) ... 483, 8 Am.Dec. 272; Barnum v. Lockhart, 75 Or. 528, ... 146 P. 975; Hymes v. Estey, 116 N.Y. 505, 22 N.E ... 1087, 15 Am.St.Rep. 421; Schurger v. Mooreman, 20 ... Idaho, ... ...
  • Leach v. Gunnarson
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • November 4, 1980
    ...court has previously considered this rule with respect to physical encumbrances in two cases: Ford v. White, supra, and Barnum v. Lockhart, 75 Or. 528, 146 P. 975 (1915). In Barnum a vendor of real property, in an installment contract, promised to provide his purchaser with a deed covenanti......
  • Hornbeck v. Smith
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1917
    ... ... of such an easement was taken into consideration by the ... parties. Maupin on Marketable Title (2d Ed.) 197; Barnum ... v. Lockhart, 75 Or. 528, 540, 146 P. 975; Wetherby ... v. Griswold, 75 Or. 468, 475, 147 P. 388; Lombard v ... Kies, 79 Or ... ...
  • Egeter v. West and North Properties
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • July 13, 1988
    ...any easements which reasonably could have been discovered. Ford v. White, 179 Or. 490, 495-96, 172 P.2d 822 (1946); Barnum v. Lockhart, 75 Or. 528, 540, 146 P. 975 (1915). It is not clear whether that rule applies to a statutory warranty deed. In Leach v. Gunnarson, 290 Or. 31, 40-42, 619 P......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT