Barrett v. Broad River Power Co.

Decision Date07 June 1928
Docket Number12460.
Citation143 S.E. 650,146 S.C. 85
PartiesBARRETT v. BROAD RIVER POWER CO.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Richland County; J. K Henry, Judge.

Action by S. J. Barrett against the Broad River Power Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and rendered.

Contracts and rules directed to be reported are as follows:

Construction Contract.

Application for Electric Service Line Extension On Addition

Class of Service Electric Lights-110 Volts.
The undersigned, hereinafter called the applicant, hereby makes application to the Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Company, hereinafter called the company, for the furnishing construction, and placing in operation of an electric service line extension, including the cost of service connections individual transformers, or increased transformer capacity, extension of primary, and secondary mains from the nearest suitable electric service line of the company located at Columbia, S. C., R. F. D. No. 1, on Old Winnsboro road, one-half block north of Clarendon street, lot of Lizzie T. Barrett owned by S. J. Barrett and occupied by S. J. Barrett as residence.
The applicant agrees to deposit with the company the sum of sixty-six and 08-100 dollars ($66.08), which is the estimated cost of all labor, material, and other items of expense required for the construction of the above-specified electric service line extension, and expressly understands and agrees that all rights and title to said electric service line extension shall at all times be and remain in the company.
Upon full payment of the above deposit to the company by the applicant, and the acceptance of his application by the company, the company shall proceed to furnish, construct, and place in operation the said electric service line extension, subject, however, to delay due to shortage of material or labor, strikes, or any other causes beyond the company's control.
Refund shall be made to applicant in accordance with general terms and conditions as filed by the company with the Railroad Commission of South Carolina.
Extension to be made in accordance with R. C. S.C. No. 1, rule No. 15.
S. J. Barrett, Applicant.
Estimated cost of extension $66.08, received by C. M. Tew, Jr., Assistant Cashier.
Refund to be in accordance with rule No. 15, J. M. Costello, Auditor.
Accepted: Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Company, by F. K. Woodring, General Manager.
Rule 15 of the Railroad Commission and other rules of the commission introduced in evidence are as follows:

15. Extension in Municipalities.

Upon request to the company to supply its service in any city or town in which the company operates for either light or power or both, at a location where it is necessary for the company to make main or distributing line extensions involving a total expenditure of an amount greater than the estimated revenue for a twelve months' period to be paid by the prospective consumer, the prospective consumer shall deposit with the company in advance an amount of money equal to the total estimated expenditure necessary for the main or distributing line extension.
When such a deposit is made with the company by the prospective consumer, the company will give the consumer credit each six months, in an amount of 25 per cent. of the consumer's bills for service furnished, until the sum of all credits is equal to the original deposit made to the company, plus 6 per cent. interest per annum.
Should additional business be secured on the main and distributing lines built under such deposit, an additional credit will be made of 25 per cent. of the additional business served from the main or distributing line extension. Settlement to be made to the depositor semiannually, January 1st and July 1st.
The aggregate of all credits shall in no case exceed the amount of the original deposit and interest charges. Should the original consumer making the deposit cease to use the company's services in the premises to which the main or distributing line extension is made, the credits will be made to the original depositor as set forth in the foregoing, in proportion to the use of the company's service by succeeding occupants of the premises, and any additional business served on the main or distributing line extension in the percentum above stipulated. Any balance of said deposit or interest charges not so repaid within five (5) years shall be retained by the company.
Nothing herein contained shall in any manner be construed as conferring upon the depositor any title or right of equity in said extension of main or distributing lines.

5. Access to Consumer's Premises.

The company's authorized agents, or employees, shall have access, at all reasonable times, to its property, and to all of the electrical wiring and equipment owned by the consumer, or any one else, and installed on the consumer's premises.

8. Cause of Discontinuance of Service.

The company reserves the right to discontinue service and disconnect its lines and remove its property for any of the following reasons: (1) For repairs; (2) for want of supply; (3) for nonpayment of bills when due; (4) for fraudulent representation in relation to consumption of electricity; (5) for violation of any of the conditions of this contract; (6) for the reason that the consumer's service is detrimental to service in general, or in his immediate locality; (7) if it conflicts with orders, ordinances, or laws of the state of South Carolina, or any political subdivision thereof.
In case service is discontinued on account of reasons 3, 4, or 5, noted above, service will only he reconnected upon payment of all money due the company, payment of a deposit, and payment of an additional amount sufficient to cover the cost of disconnecting and reconnecting service.
In the event of the consumer's plant being shut down on account of strike, fire, or lockout, thus making a complete cessation of operations unavoidable, the minimum charge or guaranty will be waived during such period, provided, however, that the term of this contract shall be extended for a corresponding period.
In case the company through any act of negligence of the consumer is prevented from supplying electricity through the entire term of this contract, there shall then become due and payable to the company, in lieu of the returns from such supply during the unexpired term of the contract, as liquidated damages and not as penalty, a further sum equal to the monthly minimum charge hereunder multiplied by the number of months remaining in the unexpired portion of said fixed term.

18. Bills.

The company will endeavor to deliver to the consumer, by mail or messenger, a monthly statement of the amount due the company under this contract. Failure to receive such statement from the company will not entitle the consumer to any delay in the settlement of each month's account beyond the date when the bill is due and payable. Unless otherwise specified, all bills will be payable at the office of the company between the hours of 8:30 a. m. and 5 p. m., within ten days of the date of bill.

Contract for Electric Service.

Name: Barrett, S. J .

Application for Electric Service.

You are hereby requested to connect your mains with the equipment scheduled on the back hereof, installed on the premises at half block North Clarendon street, city of Columbia, and furnish me with electric service for said equipment. In consideration of such connection being made I agree to take from the Columbia Railway, Gas & Electric Company all the electric service requested by me for the full term of this agreement and to pay for this service under rates as set forth in R. C. Schedule 8.
It is understood that the rates in said schedule and the service regulations are subject to changes ordered or approved by the state board having jurisdiction over public utilities.
The consumer agrees to pay the rates and observe the service regulations of the company in effect at the time service is rendered and filed with the state board having jurisdiction over public utilities.
The consumer agrees not to transfer this contract without the written consent of the company.
The term of this agreement shall extend from 1-23, 1925 (or as soon thereafter as the power company is able to deliver or the consumer to receive electric power), until terminated on a fixed date after 1-23, 1926, by either party giving to the other at least 30 days' written notice, specifying the date of termination.
In making this application, it is understood that it shall not be binding upon the company until accepted by it
through its proper executive officers, and that it shall not be modified or affected by any promise, agreement, or representation by any agent or employee of the company made before or after signing unless incorporated in writing into this agreement before acceptance by the company.
Name: S. J. Barrett,
Address: Route No. 1 .

Carter, J., dissenting.

Elliott & McLain, of Columbia, for appellant.

E. J. Best and J. B. McLaughlin, both of Columbia, for respondent.

BLEASE J.

Action, or, more properly, several actions on tort, growing out of the disconnection and discontinuance of the plaintiff's electric light service by the defendant. The trial was in the court of common pleas for Richland county, before Hon. J. K. Henry, presiding judge, and a jury. From a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, for both actual and punitive damages, the defendant appealed to this court.

The plaintiff instituted four separate suits against the defendant, in the same court, and about the same time. Each charged torts, commencing on the same day, in practically the same manner, and concerning the same premises of the plaintiff. The gist of the several...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • State v. Wallace
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • August 30, 2023
    ...Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S.__,__, 138 S.Ct. 2206, 2211, 201 L.Ed.2d 507, 515 (2018). [2] See Barrett v. Broad River Power Co., 146 S.C. 85, 96, 143 S.E. 650, 654 (1928) (calling the phrase "abuse of discretion" an "old unfortunate statement" and clarifying that the phrase "does not......
  • Shuler v. Swift & Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1937
    ... ... thereunder, the most recent of which are Barrett v ... Broad River Power Company, 146 S.C. 85, 143 S.E. 650, ... and ... ...
  • Ford v. New York Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1935
    ... ... Formerly it was ... considered that a Court of chancery had no power to ... consolidate causes pending therein, but the rule at the ...          In the ... case of Barrett v. Broad River Power Company, 146 ... S.C. 85, 143 S.E. 650, 653, Mr ... ...
  • De Pass v. Broad River Power Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 25, 1934
    ...against the company, extrinsic to the particular contract as to the supply of water or electricity." It is seen that the situation in the Barrett as disclosed by the facts recited in the opinion, is entirely different from that in the case at bar. There, as already indicated, the court poin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT