Barrois Bros., Inc. v. Lake Tankers Corporation, 3501.

Decision Date30 September 1960
Docket NumberNo. 3501.,3501.
Citation188 F. Supp. 300
PartiesBARROIS BROS., INC. v. LAKE TANKERS CORPORATION and THE M/V RAPIDS CITIES, Her Engines, Etc.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana

Cornelius Van Dalen, Christopher Tompkins, of Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, La., for libelant.

Alfred M. Farrell, Jr., Terriberry, Rault, Carroll, Martinez & Yancey, New Orleans, La., for respondent.

CHRISTENBERRY, Chief Judge.

The foregoing matter having been tried to the Court without a jury, the Court having heard evidence and the arguments of proctors, and having taken time to consider the matters, hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Findings of Fact

1. At all material times libelant was the owner and operator of the Lugger Young Thelma which was sunk as a result of collision with barges in tow of the M/V Rapids Cities in the Southwest Pass of the Mississippi River on February 1, 1957.

2. At all material times respondent was the owner and operator of the 1800 horse-power diesel tugboat Rapids Cities and the steel tank barges LTC-53 and LTC-55.

3. The Young Thelma was a single screw, wood-hull lugger, 43 feet in length, 12 feet in beam with a draft of about 4 feet. She was powered by a single 165-hp diesel engine, pilot-house controlled.

4. About 7:30 p. m. on February 1, 1957, the Young Thelma, without tow, departed Well No. 17 in Joseph Bayou (an adjunct of the Southwest Pass of the Mississippi River approximately 4 miles below the Head of the Passes) bound for Venice, Louisiana. Her master, Oneil Pitre, was at the wheel and was the sole crew member. One Hargrave, an employee of a company not a party to this litigation, was also aboard, and had assisted Pitre in mooring a barge in Joseph Bayou.

5. Shortly after getting underway, the Young Thelma entered Southwest Pass and proceeded upstream on the left ascending (west) bank. She was making good a speed of about 3 miles-per-hour over the ground against a strong 8 to 9 mile current. The weather at this time was clear, and visibility was approximately one and one-half miles.

6. After taking aboard a passenger from a disabled craft on the east bank, the Young Thelma, following the "point-bend" custom of the Mississippi River, crossed the stream again and resumed her upstream course about 200 feet off the west bank of the Southwest Pass (approximately 1500 to 1800 feet wide in this area) so as to navigate beneath the point at the juncture of Southwest Pass and the Mississippi River.

7. The Young Thelma maintained her course and speed for some 25 minutes when heavy low fog was suddenly encountered. Her master, Captain Pitre, immediately slowed the Young Thelma's engine. Seconds later a "dark shape", which proved to be the hull of the tank barge LTC-53 in tow of the Tug Rapids Cities, loomed out of the fog nearly dead ahead. Pitre immediately put the Young Thelma's engine full astern, but it was too late to avoid collision.

8. The oncoming barge ran over the Young Thelma; she made water and sank rapidly. Captain Pitre and Hargrave jumped overboard and the other passenger (whose identity was not ascertained) climbed aboard the deck of the colliding barge. Hargrave was picked up by the pilot of the Crewboat Candor which arrived on the scene several minutes later and Pitre was rescued by the crew of the Rapids Cities.

9. When the pilot of the Candor, Benjamin Dew, came on the scene following collision, he found the Rapids Cities in the middle of the river with the head of her tow toward the west bank. He observed no running lights on the Rapids Cities nor did he hear any whistle signals in the general area from the moment he located the Rapids Cities on his radar some fifteen minutes earlier until the time he arrived on the scene of collision.

10. Prior to these events, the Rapids Cities had departed Norco, Louisiana, at 8:00 a. m. on February 1, 1957, bound downstream in the Mississippi River pushing the two light barges LTC-53 and LTC-55 abreast. Each barge is 240 feet in length, 50 feet in beam and 11½ feet in depth.

11. The Rapids Cities entered the Southwest Pass at a speed of about 12 miles-per-hour, and, upon encountering a "haze" on the water, her speed was reduced to about 7 miles-per-hour over the ground.

12. Her radar was in operation and she had the Young Thelma in view on its scope, but there was no lookout stationed on the head of her tow.

13. In addition to the radar scope, the pilot of the Rapids Cities had been watching the white range light of the Young Thelma from the time it was first observed one-half mile downstream, to the time of collision.

14. The Rapids Cities' speed was not reduced at any time after entering Southwest Pass prior to the collision, and she sounded no fog signals.

15. Collision occurred about 200 feet off the west bank of Southwest Pass less than a mile below the Head of the Passes.

Conclusions of Law

1. This court has jurisdiction of the action, and venue is properly laid in the Eastern District of Louisiana. 28 U.S.C. § 1333.

2. The geographical area involved is governed by the Inland Rules of the Road, Sec. 1 (33 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.).

3. The collision in suit was caused proximately and solely by the negligence of the Rapids Cities in the following particulars:

a—In proceeding at an excessive rate of speed in fog. Article 16 of the Inland Rules (33 U.S.C.A. § 192); The Umbria, 1897, 166 U.S. 404, 417, 17 S.Ct. 610, 41 L.Ed. 1053; The Eureka, 9 Cir., 84 F.2d 49, 1936 A.M.C. 1179, 1180; The Chicago, 9 Cir., 1937 A.M.C. 1427, 1433, 94 F.2d 754, 757; The Manchioneal, 2 Cir., 1917, 243 F. 801, 805; The H. F. Dimock, 1 Cir., 1896, 77 F. 226, 229-230. The Rapids Cities' speed was particularly immoderate in view of the fact that she had not only herself to stop but also two large tank barges, with an eight mile-per-hour current underfoot. If she could not proceed at a slower speed in the fog because of the current, then she should not have been underway in the first place. The Lillian Anne, 2 Cir., 1934 A.M.C. 569, certiorari denied 1934, 293 U.S. 575, 55 S.Ct. 86, 79 L.Ed. 673; The Pennsylvania, 1873, 19 Wall. 125, 86 U.S. 125, 134, 22 L.Ed. 148; The H. F. Dimock, 1 Cir., 1896, 77 F. 226; Avondale Marine Ways, Inc., et al. v. Tug Crescent Cities, D.C.E.D.La., 184 F.Supp. 773, 1960 A.M. C. 1451.

b—In failing to keep a proper lookout. Article 29 of the Inland Rules (33 U.S.C. A. § 221); Gulf States Marine & Mining Co. v. Arthur Smith Corp., D.C.E.D. La., 156 F.Supp. 306, 1958 A.M.C. 131; C. J. Dick Towing Co. v. The Leo, D.C. S.D.Tex., 98 F.Supp. 455, 1951 A.M.C. 1539; Pure Oil Co. v. Union Barge Line Corp., D.C.W.D.Ky., 124 F.Supp. 121, 1955 A.M.C. 1116; Eymard v. Tug Bonnie Ruth, D.C.E.D.La., 120 F.Supp. 67, 1954 A.M.C. 1186; Gulf Oil Corp. v. Socony No. 16, 2 Cir., 162 F.2d 869, 870, 1947 A.M.C. 1031; The Sagamore, 1 Cir., 1917, 247 F. 743; Wood v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1954, 125 F.Supp. 42, 51, 52. The Rapids Cities was pushing ahead of her in fog two light barges, each some 240 feet in length. If a lookout had been stationed on the bow of the Rapids Cities' lead barge, he may well have seen the hull of the Young Thelma in time to direct his pilot accordingly. The pilot himself could not, and did not, maintain a proper lookout. He was attempting to watch his radar, the white light ahead, his course and speed and conditions of visibility all at the same time. Avondale Marine Ways, Inc., et al. v. Tug Crescent Cities, D.C.E.D.La., 184 F.Supp. 773, 1960 A.M.C. 1451.

c—In her blind reliance on radar, and in failing properly to interpret the information provided therefrom. Wood v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 125 F.Supp. 42, 1955 A.M.C. 142, 143; The Triton-Barenof, Sup.Ct. of Canada, 1956 A.M.C. 967; Polarus S.S. Co. v. T/S Sandefjord, et al., 2 Cir., 236 F.2d 270, 1956 A.M.C. 1779, certiorari denied 1957, Virika Rederi A/S v. Polarus S.S. Co., D.C.S.D.N. Y., 352 U.S. 982, 77 S.Ct. 383, 1 L.Ed.2d 365. Proper use of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Hogge v. SS YORKMAR
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • March 11, 1977
    ...appear to be opposed. See, e. g., Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Co. v. United States, 224 F.2d 86 (2nd Cir. 1955); Barrois Bros., Inc. v. Lake Tankers Corporation, 188 F.Supp. 300 (E.D.La.), aff'd per curiam, 286 F.2d 573 (5th Cir. 1961). Griffin on Collision § 124 (1949). These authorities hold th......
  • Matter of Hess Tankship Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • June 19, 1979
    ...of weather conditions, such speed was excessive and the vessel should have anchored rather than proceed. Barrios Brothers v. Lake Tankers Corporation, 188 F.Supp. 300, 303 (E.D.La.1960), aff'd, 286 F.2d 573 (5 Cir. 1961); The Pennsylvania, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 125, 22 L.Ed. 148 We therefore c......
  • Allied Chemical Corp. v. Hess Tankship Co. of Delaware
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 20, 1981
    ...Violations Fog Signals A vessel underway must sound whistle signals in fog. 33 U.S.C. § 191(2)(e) 15; Barrois Brothers, Inc. v. Lake Tankers Corporation, 188 F.Supp. 300 (E.D.La.1960); Griffin on Collision, §§ 134, 139. The evidence establishes that fog blanketed the Southwest Pass that nig......
  • Williamson Leasing v. American Commercial Lines
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • August 26, 1985
    ...complete stop within the limits of visibility. Hogge v. S.S. YORKMAR, 1977 A.M.C. 805, 832 (D.Md. 1977); Barrois Bros., Inc. v. Lake Tankers, Inc., 188 F.Supp. 300, 303 (E.D.La. 1960), affirmed per curiam, 286 F.2d 573 (5th Cir.1961). Because the pilot of the WOFFORD was unable to see as fa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT