Barry v. Lyon

Docket Number15-1390
Decision Date25 August 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
68 cases
  • ARJN #3 v. Cooper
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • February 5, 2021
    ...of the "exception to the mootness doctrine [that] exists for cases that are capable of repetition, yet evading review." Barry v. Lyon , 834 F.3d 706, 715 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing Wis. Right To Life, Inc. , 551 U.S. at 462, 127 S.Ct. 2652 ). "This exception applies if the challenged action is......
  • Doe v. Lee
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Tennessee
    • February 8, 2021
  • Walters v. Snyder (In re Flint Water Cases)
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • November 8, 2022
    ..."Recurrence of the issue need not be more probable than not; instead, the controversy must be capable of repetition." Barry v. Lyon , 834 F.3d 706, 715 (6th Cir. 2016). When, as here, the dispute is between two private parties, "the complaining party must show a reasonable expectation that ......
  • Mote v. City of Chelsea
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • January 2, 2018
    ...to the organization's purpose; and if the claims and relief do not require the participation of individual members." Barry v. Lyon , 834 F.3d 706, 716 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing Friends of the Earth, Inc. v.Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc. , 528 U.S. 167, 181, 120 S.Ct. 693, 145 L.Ed......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Automated Administrative State: a Crisis of Legitimacy
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 70-4, 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...note 1.148. Id.149. Surden, supra note 146.150. Citron, supra note 13, at 1269.151. Lecher, supra note 1.152. See, e.g., Barry v. Lyon, 834 F.3d 706, 710 (6th Cir. 2016) (holding that Michigan's public benefits system erroneously terminated food assistance benefits of more than 20,000 indiv......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT