Bartholomew v. City of Austin
Decision Date | 01 February 1898 |
Docket Number | 576. |
Citation | 85 F. 359 |
Parties | BARTHOLOMEW v. CITY OF AUSTIN, TEX. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
This action was instituted to recover from the city of Austin the sum of $16,900.83 for water supplied and rental of hydrants on a contract entered into between the City Water Company and the city of Austin on the 13th day of April, 1882, which contract was attached to and made a part of the petition, and of which the following is a copy:
execution of this contract, of supplying the city of Austin and the citizens thereof with water by a system of waterworks constructed upon the method of supplying a city with water, either for domestic use or for the extinguishment of fire, that is to say, by pumping the water directly into the mains with contrivances by which the pressure on those mains may be increased or diminished, or preserved uniform.
'Sec. 2. The said company is hereby authorized to establish, construct, maintain and operate said works in said city of Austin; to receive, take and store, construct and distribute water throught the city; to construct and extend aqueducts, mains and pipes through all the streets, alleys, lanes and public grounds, across any stream or bridges in said city; to erect and maintain all engines, machinery and other appliances necessary for the proper conducting of said works, and for supplying said city and the inhabitants thereof with water for domestic, manufacturing, fire and other purposes. The said City Water Company shall have the right to take up all pavements or sidewalks on streets, alleys, lanes or public grounds, and make such excavation therein as may be necessary to lay, repair and maintain aqueducts and pipes below the surface of the ground for conveying and distributing said water as aforesaid; provided that said company shall, within a reasonable time, replace and repair all pavements and sidewalks and fill all such excavations and restore the streets in as good condition as they were in before.
'Sec. 3. That said company shall be liable for all damages occasioned by a failure to guard and protect persons and property from injury by reason of the removal of such pavements and sidewalks, or the making of such excavations as aforesaid. The rights and liabilities provided for in this contract shall continue for a period of twenty years, unless sooner extinguished by purchase as hereinafter provided.
'Sec. 4. The said waterworks shall be constructed with pumps of not less capacity than three million gallons in twenty-four hours, and also to produce the fire streams hereinafter mentioned, the pumps shall be what is known as the quadruplex compound condensing pumping engines of the Holly Company, and there shall be in addition an auxiliary, or reserve high pressure pump of the same capacity, making an aggregate easy working capacity of five million gallons per day.
'Sec. 5. The said City Water Company shall lay six miles of mains and pipes, more or less, as shown on the plat which makes a part of this contract, and is marked 'Exhibit A,' for the distribution of water in said city, in addition to the mains and pipes already in use. The mains and pipes used in this extension shall be of proper sizes, and the said City Water Company shall replace such of its mains now in use with such other mains and pipes as to secure, in connection with the extensions herein mentioned, an easy flow of water through the entire system of mains, and to comply with all the conditions of this contract: such mains shall be from four inches to sixteen inches in their inner diameter, and shall be of standard weight and strength to insure the fire streams hereinafter mentioned.
' Sec. 6. The said city of Austin shall, by a vote of the city council, have the right to take up any of the hydrants on the mains and pipes now in use and relocate them upon the extensions designated in section 5, and the said city of Austin shall also order twenty-five hydrants at the expense of the City Water Company, in addition to the number now in use, to be located upon said extensions, making in all one hundred hydrants upon the entire pipe distribution herein contemplated. The city of Austin hereby agrees to pay said City Water Company an annual rental of one hundred dollars for each of said one hundred hydrants, for the purposes contemplated in this contract, which said rental shall be paid semiannually on the first of July and January of each year in a warrant drawn on the city treasurer, that is to say, at the end of each half year or six months, during the full time specified in this contract, the first payment of each of these hydrants to become due and payable at the end of six months, after each of such hydrants is placed in position and ready for use; and, for the purpose of providing for the payment of all hydrants rental becoming due under the provisions of this contract, the city council shall annually make an appropriation sufficient to pay the same out of the first moneys not otherwise appropriated, arising from the general revenue of the city.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Parkersburg v. Baltimore & O.R. Co.
... ... City of ... Waterville, 93 Me. 586, 45 A. 830, 49 L.R.A. 294; ... Phillips v. City of Portsmouth, 115 Va. 180, 78 S.E ... 651; Bartholomew v. City of Austin, 85 F. 359, 29 ... C.C.A. 568; Grant v. Davenport, 36 Iowa, 405; ... Montclair Water Co. v. Town of Montclair, 81 N.J ... ...
-
Sulcer v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co. (of Milwaukee, Wis.)
...25 (1902); People v. Rawn, 90 Mich. 377, 51 N.W. 522 (1892); Green v. State, 59 Md. 123, 43 Am.Rep. 542 (1882). In Bartholomew v. City of Austin, 85 F. 359 (5 Cir., 1898), the court said: * * * "Exemption" means free from liability, from duty, from service. It is a grace, a favor, an immuni......
-
Kinney v. Murray
... ... parties' rights have accrued. Bergers v ... Seligman, 107 U.S. 32; L. R. Co. v. City, 76 F ... 296; Clark v. Beaver, 139 U.S. 96; Speer v ... Board of Coms., 88 F. 749; olomew v. City of ... Austin, 85 F. 359; Ryan v. Stephens, 76 F. 721; ... Christian Union v. Young, 101 U.S. 352. (The ... ...
-
Columbia Ave Savings Fund, Safe Deposit, Title & Trust Co. v. City of Dawson
... ... point has been followed and approved in a great ... [130 F. 167] ... number of cases, which need not be cited. See Bartholomew ... v. City of Austin, 85 F. 359, 29 C.C.A. 568 ... In ... Speer v. Board of County Commissioners, 88 F. 749, 32 ... C.C.A. 101, the ... ...