Bartkus v. People of the State of Illinois, No. 39

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM; BRENNAN
Citation355 U.S. 281,2 L.Ed.2d 270,78 S.Ct. 336
PartiesAlfonse BARTKUS, petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
Docket NumberNo. 39
Decision Date06 January 1958

355 U.S. 281
78 S.Ct. 336
2 L.Ed.2d 270
Alfonse BARTKUS, petitioner,

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

No. 39.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 6, 1958
Judgment Vacated May 26, 1958.

Mr. Walter T. Fisher, for petitioner.

Mr. William C. Wines, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Illinois (Messrs. Latham Castle, Atty. Gen., and Theodore G. Maheras, Asst. Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

See 356 U.S. 969, 78 S.Ct. 1004.

On writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond, No. 2014AP1938.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • December 18, 2015
    ...will not cause the petition to be granted, 365 Wis.2d 620although it may be granted for other reasons. But in Bartkus v. Illinois, 355 U.S. 281 [78 S.Ct. 336, 2 L.Ed.2d 270], 356 U.S. 969 [78 S.Ct. 1004, 2 L.Ed.2d 1075] (1958), 359 U.S. 121 [79 S.Ct. 676, 3 L.Ed.2d 684] (1959), and in Ladne......
  • Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois, No. 1
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 30, 1959
    ...77 S.Ct. 150, 1 L.Ed.2d 116; 352 U.S. 958, 77 S.Ct. 358. On January 6, 1958, the judgment below was affirmed by an equally divided Court. 355 U.S. 281, 78 S.Ct. 336, 2 L.Ed.2d 270. On May 26, 1958, the Court granted a petition for rehearing, vacated the judgment entered January 6, 1958, and......
  • United States v. Hoyland, No. 12320.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • March 30, 1959
    ...trials by different sovereignties." Even so, defendant argues: "However, there is a case Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois, 355 U.S. 281, 78 S.Ct. 336, 2 L.Ed.2d 270; Id., 356 U.S. 969, 78 S.Ct. 1004, 2 L.Ed.2d 1075 (via certiorari) presently before the United States Supreme Court in w......
3 cases
  • New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond, No. 2014AP1938.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    • December 18, 2015
    ...will not cause the petition to be granted, 365 Wis.2d 620although it may be granted for other reasons. But in Bartkus v. Illinois, 355 U.S. 281 [78 S.Ct. 336, 2 L.Ed.2d 270], 356 U.S. 969 [78 S.Ct. 1004, 2 L.Ed.2d 1075] (1958), 359 U.S. 121 [79 S.Ct. 676, 3 L.Ed.2d 684] (1959), and in Ladne......
  • Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois, No. 1
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 30, 1959
    ...77 S.Ct. 150, 1 L.Ed.2d 116; 352 U.S. 958, 77 S.Ct. 358. On January 6, 1958, the judgment below was affirmed by an equally divided Court. 355 U.S. 281, 78 S.Ct. 336, 2 L.Ed.2d 270. On May 26, 1958, the Court granted a petition for rehearing, vacated the judgment entered January 6, 1958, and......
  • United States v. Hoyland, No. 12320.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • March 30, 1959
    ...trials by different sovereignties." Even so, defendant argues: "However, there is a case Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois, 355 U.S. 281, 78 S.Ct. 336, 2 L.Ed.2d 270; Id., 356 U.S. 969, 78 S.Ct. 1004, 2 L.Ed.2d 1075 (via certiorari) presently before the United States Supreme Court in w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT