Bartlett v. Atchison
Decision Date | 13 June 1884 |
Citation | 32 Kan. 134,4 P. 178 |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Parties | E. BARTLETT, as Treasurer of Edwards County, v. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD CO |
Error from Edwards District Court.
ACTION commenced October 8, 1883, in the district court of Edwards county, by The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company against E. Bartlett, as treasurer of Edwards county. The petition alleged:
On December 27, 1883, the following agreed statement of facts was filed:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The City of Topeka v. McCabe
... ... manifestly intended as a substitute therefor. (The ... State, ex rel., v. Studt, 31 Kan. 245, 1 P ... 635; Bartlett, Treas., v. A. T. & S. F. Rld ... Co., 32 Kan. 134, 4 P. 178; C. K. & N. Rly. Co ... v. City of Manhattan, 45 Kan. 419, 25 P. 879; The ... State ... ...
-
Howard v. Hulbert
... ... 87, 11 A. 137; Hoetzel v. East ... Orange, 50 id. 354, 12 A. 911.) That the two acts are ... repugnant we may not doubt. (Bartlett, Treas., v. A. T ... & S. F. Rld Co., 32 Kan. 134, 4 P. 178.) ... We ... conclude that the general act of 1885 repealed the special ... ...
-
The Atchison v. The Board of County Commissioners of The County of Cloud
... ... the general statutory limit. In Comm'rs of Osborne v ... Blake, 25 Kan. 356, a judgment rendered on county ... warrants issued to pay current expenses was held to be in ... that category, and it was held that an excess tax could not ... be levied to pay such judgment. The case of Bartlett, ... Treas., v. A. T. & S. F. Rld. Co., 32 Kan. 134, 4 P ... 178, had nothing to do with bridges. Taxes for support of the ... poor were held to be current expenses in A. T. & S ... F. Rld. Co. v. Wilhelm, Treas., 33 Kan. 206, 6 P. 273, ... no reference being made to bridges. In A. T. & S ... ...
-
Atchison
... ... the legislature passed an act which limited the levy for the ... current expenses of any one year to one per cent. on the ... dollar, where the taxable property of a county is less than $ ... 5,000,000. (Gen. Stat. of 1868, ch. 25, § 181; Comp ... Laws of 1879, ch. 25, § 220; Bartlett v. A. T. & ... S. F. Rld. Co., 32 Kan. 134.) The levy of two mills upon ... all the taxable property of Jefferson county for the ... "poor-fund," is therefore illegal, because in ... excess of the levy of ten mills for county or current ... expenses, and not having been authorized by a direct ... ...