Bartlett v. McDaniel
Decision Date | 30 April 1831 |
Citation | 3 Mo. 55 |
Parties | BARTLETT v. MCDANIEL. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
ERROR FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.
C. H. ALLEN, for plaintiff.
HUNT, for defendant.
Bartlett sued McDaniel before a justice of the peace and obtained a judgment.In the Circuit Court, to which McDaniel had appealed, the judgment of the justice was reversed and the cause dismissed, and to reverse this judgment Bartlett prosecutes his suit here by writ of error.The action before the justice was for damages sustained by plaintiff, by reason of a trespass charged to have been committed by the defendant, by castrating the plaintiff's bull.In the fifth section of the act to establish Justices' Courts, &c., it is required that in all suits a brief statement of the cause of action, and the amount claimed, shall be made in writing and filed with the justice, and the same or a copy annexed to the summons; and that the service thereof shall be by reading the original summons, and the complaint or statement annexed thereto in the hearing of the defendant.The plaintiff filed with the justice a sufficient statement of his cause of action, and the summons of the justice required the defendant to answer unto Robert B. Bartlett in an action of trespass vi et armis for castrating a bull, damages forty-five dollars.It does not appear that a statement of the cause of action was either annexed to the summons or read to the defendant.The defendant appeared before the justice and defended.
It is contended by the plaintiff: First.That the defendant attended before the justice of the peace and defended, and thereby waived all exceptions.Second.That the notice of his complaint being substantially incorporated in the summons, it was not material that the statement required by the act should be annexed to the summons, and read to the defendant.
First.It is true that if there has been an imperfect return of the service of a summons and the defendant appears and defends, he...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
State ex rel. Pemiscot County v. Scott
...having appeared by attorney at the return term, they waived all informalities in the service and return of the writ of summons. Bartlett v. McDaniel, 3 Mo. 55; Lindell v. Bank, 4 Mo. 228; Griffin Samuel, 6 Mo. 50; Evans v. King, 7 Mo. 411; Hembree v. Campbell, 8 Mo. 572; Phillebart v. Evans......
-
Samuels v. Shelton
...and such an “appearance to any regular steps in the progress of a cause is a waiver of notice.” (Bonney v. Baldwin, 3 Mo. 49; Bartlett v. McDaniel, 3 Mo. 55; Denton v. Noyes, 6 Johns. 295.) The decree against him cannot be impeached collaterally. (Bernecker v. Miller, 44 Mo. 102.) Ellison &......
-
Fenn v. Dugdale
...in the circuit court, because there the trial is de novo. (R. C. 1855, p. 175, § 7.) The defect was not cured by appearance. (Bartlett v. McDaniel, 3 Mo. 55.) III. The transcript was not evidence of anything against Dugdale. (Smith v. Ross, 7 Mo. 463.) Lackland, Cline & Jamison, for respond......