Bartlette v. State, 5 Div. 986
| Decision Date | 28 May 1985 |
| Docket Number | 5 Div. 986 |
| Parties | Luther BARTLETTE v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Charles R. Gaddy, Millbrook, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Fred F. Bell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging the loss of prison incentive good time. The petition is meritorious on its face and the District Attorney's motion to dismiss is not responsive to the petitioner's allegations concerning the loss of good time as the petitioner recognized in his answer to the motion to dismiss. The petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. Ex parte Boatwright, 471 So.2d 1257 (Ala.1985). Where the State does not file an answer or return denying the specific allegations of fact in the petition, the facts as set out in the petition must be taken as true. Ex parte Williams, 461 So.2d 1339 (Ala.1984) (Torbert, C.J., concurring specially).
The judgment of the circuit court denying the petition is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions that an evidentiary hearing be held concerning the merits and allegations of the petition.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
All Judges concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Williams v. State, 7 Div. 798
...Brief, p. 1.) We agree. The petition is meritorious on its face, and Williams is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. Bartlette v. State, 472 So.2d 706 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). "Where the State does not file an answer or return denying the specific allegations of fact in the petition, the facts as......
-
Jackson v. State, 7 Div. 725
...and therefore the appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing. Ex parte Boatwright, 471 So.2d 1257 (Ala.1985); Bartlette v. State, 472 So.2d 706 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). The judgment of the circuit court denying the petition is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions that an evide......
-
Williams v. State, 3 Div. 687
...the purpose of these proceedings, the allegations must be taken as true. Ex parte Hawkins, 475 So.2d 489 (Ala.1985); Bartlette v. State, 472 So.2d 706 (Ala.Cr.App.1985); The Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is enforceable against the states by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment. Smit......
-
Teat v. State
...motion to dismiss is not responsive to Teat's allegations. Thus, these unrefuted facts must be taken as true. Id.; Bartlette v. State, 472 So.2d 706 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing Teat's petition. This judgment is reversed, and......