Bartley v. Augusta Country Club, Inc.

Decision Date19 February 1985
Docket NumberNo. 41757,41757
Citation254 Ga. 144,326 S.E.2d 442
PartiesBARTLEY v. AUGUSTA COUNTRY CLUB, INC.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

W. Barry Williams, Martinez, for James L. Bartley, Jr.

Wyckliffe A. Knox, Jr., Raymond G. Chadwick, Jr., W.M. Fulcher, Augusta, for Augusta Country Club, Inc.

MARSHALL, Presiding Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant appeals from the trial court's award of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee incorporated, private, nonprofit social club, in the appellant former member's action to enjoin the club from prohibiting him from being a member of the club after the club had expelled him from membership pursuant to its bylaws for conduct "endangering the good order, welfare or character of the club."

The showing on the motion for summary judgment was that the conduct in question consisted of assisting his wife to sue the club, thereby putting its reputation and financial resources in jeopardy (see Bartley v. Augusta Country Club, 166 Ga.App. 1, 303 S.E.2d 129 (1983)); assisting his wife in preparing and distributing a letter derogatory of the club's actions; causing disruption within the club's membership by actively advocating his wife's lawsuit; making continuous complaints about the operation of the club; and becoming involved in a locker-room fracas regarding those complaints. Held:

1. Some of the appellant's claims are based on various alleged ways in which the club's action in expelling him violated his constitutional rights. "However, disciplinary actions taken by a private, social club against its members are not matters of constitutional law. Appellant's rights, if any, are governed by the by-laws, which constitute the agreement between the corporation and its members. Hornady v. Goodman, 167 Ga. 555, 572, 146 S.E. 173 [1928]; Tuttle v. Walton, 1 Ga. 43, 48-49 [1846]." Bartley v. Augusta Country Club, 166 Ga.App. 1, supra, (2). "[J]udicial inquiry into the suspension or expulsion of a member of an incorporated, private, social club is limited to a determination of whether the club has acted ' "in good faith under the by-laws adopted by it." ' Smooth Ashlar Grand Lodge v. Odom, 136 Ga.App. 812, 814, 222 S.E.2d 614 [1975] ... [T]he courts should not interfere with a club's authorized, good[-]faith exercise of discretion in disciplining members." Bartley, supra, (4). The appellant was afforded the process provided for in the by-laws, i.e., ten-days' notice and a hearing. There is no evidence that the club's action in expelling the appellant was not in good faith, nor that it was not authorized within the club's discretion under the by-law permitting expulsion for conduct "endangering the good order, welfare or character of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Rose v. Zurowski, A98A2184.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 29, 1999
    ...Medlin v. Carpenter, 174 Ga.App. 50, 55(8), 329 S.E.2d 159 (1985). 14. (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Bartley v. Augusta Country Club, 254 Ga. 144(1), 326 S.E.2d 442 (1985); see Atlanta Country Club v. Smith, 217 Ga.App. 515, 517(1), 458 S.E.2d 136 (1995) ("disciplinary matters pertai......
  • Pollock v. Crestview Country Club Ass'n
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • May 1, 2009
    ...over expulsion do not engage constitutional due process protections, either substantive or procedural. See Bartley v. Augusta Country Club, Inc., 254 Ga. 144, 326 S.E.2d 442 (1985); Rose v. Zurowski, 236 Ga.App. 157, 160, 511 S.E.2d 265 (Ga.App. 1999); Garvey v. Seattle Tennis Club, 60 Wash......
  • Citizens and Southern Nat. Bank v. Haskins
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 14, 1985
  • Nania v. Sunset Country Club
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 15, 1994
    ...club are governed by its by-laws which constitute the agreement between the corporation and its members. Bartley v. Augusta Country Club, Inc., 254 Ga. 144, 326 S.E.2d 442, 443 (1985). Thus, the purpose of Sunset's corporate existence is crucial to resolving the enforceability of Sunset's b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT