Basin Truck Co., Application of

Decision Date31 March 1961
Docket NumberNo. 34847,34847
Citation108 N.W.2d 388,172 Neb. 28
PartiesApplication of BASIN TRUCK COMPANY, Denver, Colorado, et al. BASIN TRUCK COMPANY and Vernon Lloyd Miller Trucking, Inc., Appellants, v. ALL CLASS I RAIL CARRIES IN NEBRASKA, Appellees.
CourtNebraska Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court

An order of the Nebraska State Railway Commission which fails to make findings of ultimate facts is irregular and will be set aside upon appeal.

Nelson, Harding & Acklie, Lincoln, Robert S. Stauffer, Cheyenne, Wyo., for appellants.

Harvey L. Goth, Lincoln, James E. Steffarud, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.

Heard before SIMMONS, C. J., and CARTER, MESSMORE, YEAGER, WENKE, SPENCER and BOSLAUGH, JJ.

BOSLAUGH, Justice.

This is an appeal from the Nebraska State Railway Commission in proceedings involving the application of Basin Truck Company and the application of Vernon Lloyd Miller for authority to transport cement in bulk as common carriers between points in Nebraska over irregular routes.

Protests were filed to the applications and a hearing was held before an examiner upon a consolidated record.The examiner recommended that the applications be granted.

Exceptions were filed to the examiner's report and recommendation; and after hearing and argument on the exceptions before the commission, the commission entered separate orders sustaining the exceptions to the examiner's report and denying the applications.Motions for rehearing were filed and overruled.

The order of the commission denying the application of Basin Truck Company, after reciting the proceedings had up to that time in reference to the application, is as follows:

'The Commission, upon due consideration of the evidence adduced at the hearing, the Examiner's report and recommendation, the exceptions thereto and the oral arguments thereon, and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds the Exceptions to the Examiner's report should be Sustained, the Examiner's report Overruled and the application Denied.

'ORDER

'IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the Nebraska State Railway Commission that ApplicationNo. M-10747, SupplementNo. 5 of Basin Truck Company, Denver, Colorado be, and the same is hereby, Denied.'The order in reference to the application of Vernon Lloyd Miller is the same except for the name of the applicant.

The appellant assign as error the failure of the commission to make findings of fact.In the motions for rehearingthe appellants alleged that the orders were contrary to law.

Section 84-915, R.S.Supp., 1959, provides in part as follows: 'Every decision and order adverse to a party to the proceeding, rendered by an agency in a contested case, shall be in writing or stated in the record and shall be accompanied by findings of fact and conclusions of law.'

In Young v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 171 Neb. 784, 107 N.W.2d 752, the court held that a finding by the commission of the ultimate facts substantially in the language of the statute was a sufficient compliance with this section.In Ferguson Trucking Co., Inc. v. Rogers Truck Line, 164 Neb. 85, 81 N.W.2d 915, the court held that an order of the commission making ultimate findings of fact in the language of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Central Platte Natural Resources Dist. v. State of Wyo.
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • March 25, 1994
    ... ... For purposes of an instream flow application, unappropriated water is that water which is available for appropriation ... Accord Temescal Water Co. v. Dept. of Public Works, 44 Cal.2d 90, 280 P.2d 1 (1955) (stating that ... The applicants proposed to divert water from the South Platte River basin to the Frenchman River, which flows into the Enders Reservoir and ... See, Basin Truck Co. v. All Class 1 Rail Carriers, 172 Neb. 28, 108 N.W.2d 388 (1961); ... ...
  • Smith v. Andrews Van Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1971
    ...commission which fails to make findings of ultimate facts is irregular and will be set aside upon appeal. Basin Truck Co. v. All Class I Rail Carriers, 172 Neb. 28, 108 N.W.2d 388. In the order of April 27, 1970, the commission made no finding other than that the application should be grant......
  • Prigge v. Johns
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • February 28, 1969
    ... ... Goodnow v. Litchfield, 67 Iowa 691, 25 N.W. 882; Salzer Lumber Co. v. Claflin, 16 N.D. 601, 113 N.W. 1036. No prejudice is shown because of ... 107] Inc., 171 Neb. 784, 107 N.W.2d 752; Basin Truck Co. v. All Class I Rail Carriers, 172 Neb. 28, 108 N.W.2d 388. But ... Co. v. Wilgocki, 171 Neb. 425, 106 N.W.2d 486; In re Application of Hergott, 145 Neb. 100, 15 N.W.2d 418. An order of the director ... ...
  • Yellow Cab Co., Application of
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • April 5, 1963
    ...absence of findings of fact errors, if any, in this respect cannot be considered by this court on appeal In Basin Truck Co. v. All Class I Rail Carriers, 172 Neb. 28, 108 N.W.2d 388, this court said: 'An order of the Nebraska State Railway Commission which fails to make findings of ultimate......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT