Bateman v. US. Postal Serv., 99-15394
| Decision Date | 02 November 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-15394,99-15394 |
| Citation | 219 F.3d 1029 |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 2000) WALTER BATEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, <A HREF="#fr1-1" name="fn1-1">1 Postmaster General, Defendants-Appellees, and AARON JOHNSON; BEN FUKUMITSU; DAVID BURNS; JOSE MALLARI, Defendants |
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
Bateman v. US. Postal Serv.
...REHEARING AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER Michael Daly Hawkins, Circuit Judge: The Opinion filed on July 26, 2000, and appearing at 219 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir.2000), is amended as At page 1031, footnote 2, following the second sentence in the footnote, insert: Counsel for the Postal Service may have ......
2 books & journal articles
-
Motions
...potential impact on the proceedings. • Reason for the delay. • Whether the movant acted in good faith. Bateman v. U.S. Postal Service , 219 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2000). The following are factors used to decide whether to set aside a judgment under FRCP 60, particularly if the motion seeks rel......
-
Table of Cases
...(3rd Cir. 1982), §9:34.1 Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass’n , 897 F.2d 999, 1018 (9th Cir. 1990), §7:98 Bateman v. U.S. Postal Service, 219 F.3d 1029 (9th Cir. 2000), §7:176.1 Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 (1986), §§10:26, 10:30 Battles v. City of Fort Myers , 127 F.3d 1298, 1300 (11th......