Bates v. Swasey
| Decision Date | 23 May 1884 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 4969. |
| Citation | Bates v. Casey, 61 Tex. 592 (Tex. 1884) |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
| Parties | F. C. BATES v. CASEY & SWASEY. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
ERROR from Mitchell. Tried below before the Hon. T. B. Wheeler.
Smith & Merrill, for plaintiff in error.
No briefs on file for defendant in error.
The record does not show any service of citation upon the appellant, nor any waiver of service, nor appearance by him in the cause. Judgment was, however, taken against him by default, which was error, and will require a reversal of the judgment by this court.
This cause was transferred from the county to the district court, because the county judge was disqualified to hear and determine it. The grounds of his disqualification are not stated, nor do we think it necessary that they should be, when he recuses himself, unless they are questioned before the cause reaches this court. If a party wishes to dispute the fact that the county judge is disqualified, he can by calling it in question, either in the district or county court, have the grounds of the supposed disqualification set forth and established. Any improper ruling upon the subject could then be revised upon appeal to this court, by bringing it to our attention as in case of other errors.
But where no such question is made below, and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Wood v. Love
...of process on the defendant, a waiver by him of such service, or an appearance by him in answer to the adverse party's suit. Bates v. Casey, 61 Tex. 592; Shook v. Laufer, 84 S. W. 277; Mayhew v. Harrell, 57 Tex. Civ. App. 509, 122 S. W. 957; Burditt v. Howth, 45 Tex. 466. That judgment by d......
-
De Proy v. Progakis
...that defendant was duly served with citation. Blossman v. Letchford et al., 17 Tex. 647; Burditt v. Howth, 45 Tex. 466; Bates v. Casey & Swasey, 61 Tex. 592; Bomar v. Morris, 59 Tex. Civ. App. 378, 126 S. W. 663; Shook v. Laufer (Tex. Civ. App.) 84 S. W. 277; Carlton v. Miller, 2 Tex. Civ. ......
-
Franco-Texan Land Co. v. Howe
...entered by Germany was a nullity because it does not state the ground of his disqualification, we think it erred. In the case of Bates v. Casey, 61 Tex. 592, it is said: "This cause was transferred from the county to the district court because the county judge was disqualified to hear and d......