Bauer Enterprises, Inc. v. Frye, 19019
Decision Date | 16 June 1989 |
Docket Number | No. 19019,19019 |
Citation | 382 S.E.2d 71,181 W.Va. 234 |
Parties | BAUER ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation v. Hon. Andrew N. FRYE, Jr., Judge of the Circuit Court of Tucker County, Alma F. Fowler, and James "Jim" Strahin. |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. "A motion for summary judgment should be granted only when it is clear that there is no genuine issue of fact to be tried and inquiry concerning the facts is not desirable to clarify the application of the law." Syllabus Point 3, Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Ins. Co. of N.Y., 148 W.Va. 160, 133 S.E.2d 770 (1963).
2. Syllabus, Ash v. Twyman, --- W.Va. ----, 324 S.E.2d 138 (1984).
James F. Cain, Elkins, for Bauer Enterprises, Inc.
William M. Miller, Parsons, for Fowler and Strahin.
In this original proceeding in prohibition, the relator, Bauer Enterprises, Inc. (Bauer), asks that we direct the respondent, the Honorable Andrew N. Frye, Jr. Judge of the Circuit Court of Tucker County, to grant the petitioner's motion for a summary judgment against the respondent, Alma F. Fowler. Bauer's contention is that the trial court clearly acted in excess of its authority since there was no genuine issue of material fact. We disagree, and deny the writ.
Certain facts are undisputed. Beginning in the fall of 1986, and at various times thereafter, Bauer furnished materials to James "Jim" Strahin, doing business as PTL Builders, an unincorporated company. This was for the construction of two dwellings or buildings on adjoining parcels of land, Lots No. 17 and 18, which he owned in Lambert Meadows, Parsons, West Virginia. On December 17, 1986, Ms. Fowler purchased from Mr. Strahin the dwelling constructed on Lot No. 18. As part of the closing transaction, a release of mechanic's lien was executed by Bauer and other suppliers of materials, supplies, or equipment supplied to Jim Strahin as contractor for the construction of the dwelling on Lot No. 18.
On April 25, 1987, the PTL Builders account with Bauer had an unpaid balance due and owing in the sum of $13,738.73. This included two window screens purchased on March 26, 1987, the last items allegedly sold and delivered to Ms. Fowler. On May 20, 1987, Bauer perfected a materialman's lien for the outstanding balance against the Fowler property. In July, 1987, Bauer commenced an action to enforce the materialman's lien and, in October, 1987, moved for summary judgment in accordance with Rule 56 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure. Bauer submitted supporting affidavits by its agents, a delivery person and an accountant/bookkeeper.
Bauer claims that it was entitled to a materialman's lien for materials or supplies used in the construction of the Fowler home by virtue of a contract between it and the general contractor, Mr. Strahin. W.Va.Code, 38-2-4 (1923).
On January 25, 1988, the circuit court heard testimony from Bauer's affiants about the sale and delivery of materials for use on the Fowler property. 1 Bauer's delivery person, on cross-examination, testified that he had not delivered the screens to Lot No. 18, but that Mr. Strahin had picked them up at the Bauer store. The accountant testified on cross-examination that the Bauer records showed that the screens were sold to Mr. Strahin, d/b/a PTL Builders, but she could not tell from the records how the screens were transferred or in which house they were used.
An outside salesman for Bauer testified that he took the order for the screens from PTL Builders. He also confirmed that invoices for other goods and chattels reflected the transactions which took place between Bauer and PTL Builders. On cross-examination, he stated that he knew Mr. Strahin had built two adjacent houses and that there was no way to tell what material was used in Ms. Fowler's house except by the time frame. The circuit court denied Bauer's motion for summary judgment, concluding that the facts were not undisputed.
Bauer renewed its motion for summary judgment and assigned as a ground that its affidavits were not rebutted by counter affidavits or any other proof whatsoever. The court again overruled the motion for summary judgment on February 14, 1989. By agreement between the parties, the circuit court heard testimony on Bauer's renewed motion for summary judgment. Mr. Strahin appeared for Bauer. He stated that he personally delivered the screens to Ms. Fowler. On cross-examination, he stated that he had built the two houses at the same time and did not know which Bauer materials had been used in Ms. Fowler's house. Consequently, he could not say which part of the bill owed to Bauer was for materials used in Ms. Fowler's house. He also stated that Bauer had executed a release of a mechanic's lien prior to the December, 1986 closing on Ms. Fowler's house. At the conclusion of the hearing the court again ruled that there was a material issue of fact to be resolved and denied the motion for summary judgment.
Bauer rests its entitlement to a summary judgment on our holding in Syllabus Point 1 of Crain v. Lightner, --- W.Va. ----, 364 S.E.2d 778 (1987), which states:
"
In this case, Ms. Fowler neither submitted affidavits nor presented any witnesses on her behalf. Bauer appears to argue that the testimony elicited by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fayette County Nat. Bank v. Lilly
... ... pt. 1, Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc., 194 W.Va. 52, 459 S.E.2d 329 (1995); Syl. pt. 2, ... matter of law." It was also noted by this Court in Bauer Enterprises, Inc. v. Frye, 181 W.Va. 234, 237, 382 S.E.2d ... ...
-
Kronjaeger v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., 23829
... ... McDonough Caperton Insurance Group, Inc., a West ... Virginia Corporation, Defendants Below, ... 160, 133 S.E.2d 770 (1963).' Syl. Pt. 1, Bauer Enters., Inc. v. Frye, 181 W.Va. 234, 382 S.E.2d 71 ... ...
- State ex rel. Vanderra Resources, LLC v. Hummel
- Earth Pipeline Servs., Inc. v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC (In re Welded Constr., L.P.)