Bauman v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP., 07-15386.
| Decision Date | 06 May 2010 |
| Docket Number | No. 07-15386.,07-15386. |
| Citation | 603 F.3d 1141 |
| Parties | Barbara BAUMAN; Gregory Greco; Josefina Nunez; Gabriele Nunez; Miriam Nunez; Silvia Nunez; Emilio Guillermo Pesce; Mirta Hayde Arenas; Graciela Gigena; Guillermo Alberto Gigena; Nuria Gigena; Amelia Schiaffo; Elba Lechner; Anunciacion Spaltro De Belmont; Hector Ratto; Eduardo Northern Olasiregui; Ricardo Martin California, Hoffman; Eduardo Estiville; San Jose Alfredo Manuel Martin; Juan Jose Martin; Jose Barreiro; Alejandro Daer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and Daimlerchrysler AG, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Terrance Collingsworth, Esquire, Natacha H. Thys, Esquire, Senior, Conrad & Scherer, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Peter J. Messrobian, Esquire, Sedgwick, Detret, Moran & Arnold LLP, Matthew James Kemner, Esquire, Carroll Burdick & McDonough, LLP, Robert A. Mittelstaedt, Esquire, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
Appellants' Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion filed on August 28, 2009 is vacated. This case shall be reheard by the 3-judge panel the week of June 21, 2010, in Pasadena, California. The date and time of oral argument will be set soon, and counsel should inform this court of any potential conflicts immediately.
The parties are ordered to submit supplemental briefs addressing the following questions:
These supplemental briefs shall be no longer than ten pages or 2800 words, and shall be submitted no later than 14 days after the entry of this order. Parties who are registered for Appellate ECF must file the supplemental brief electronically. Parties who are not registered Appellate ECF filers must file the original supplemental brief plus seven paper copies.
The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied as moot without prejudice to filing a new petition for rehearing en banc.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vallarta v. United Airlines, Inc., Case No. 19-cv-05895-HSG
...showing of jurisdictional facts." Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler , 579 F.3d 1088, 1094 (9th Cir. 2009), vacated on other grounds , 603 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2010) (quotations omitted). "Any greater burden such as proof by a preponderance of the evidence would permit a defendant to obtain a dismiss......
-
White Knight Yacht LLC v. Certain Lloyds at Lloyd's London
...showing of jurisdictional facts." Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler , 579 F.3d 1088, 1094 (9th Cir. 2009), vacated on other grounds , 603 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2010) (quotations and citations omitted). A prima facie showing "must be based on affirmative proof beyond the pleadings, such as affidavits,......
-
Bauman v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
...appeal, the panel initially affirmed the district court. Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 579 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir.2009), vacated, 603 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir.2010). Then—after granting rehearing and without additional oral argument—the panel inexplicably changed its mind and reversed the district......
-
AU-TOMOTIVE GOLD v. Volkswagen of America
... ... In Sebastian Int'l, Inc. v. Longs Drug Stores Corp., 53 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir.1995), we held that the "first sale" ... ...
-
Civil Procedure - Ninth Circuit focuses on importance of subsidiary rather than control to impose general jurisdiction over foreign corporation - Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
...Corp., 579 F.3d 1088, 1079-97 (9th Cir. 2009) (holding parent corporation must exercise pervasive control of subsidiary), vacated, 603 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2010). The court stated that for an agency relationship to exist that warrants the attribution of jurisdiction, the parent must exert pe......
-
The Judicial Philosophy of Chief Justice John Roberts: an Analysis Through the Eyes of International Law
...or any other state—have a strong interest in adjudicating and redressing international human rights abuses."), reh'g granted, vacated, 603 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2010).62. Filártiga, 630 F.2d at 878. 63. Since Filártiga was decided, the U.S. Congress passed the Torture Victim Protection Act. 2......