Bays v. City of Fairborn
| Docket Number | 10-4059 |
| Decision Date | 13 February 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
166 cases
-
Doster v. Kendall
...Force violated RFRA when it denied their requests for religious exemptions from its COVID-19 vaccine mandate. See Bays v. City of Fairborn , 668 F.3d 814, 819 (6th Cir. 2012).We start with the RFRA ground rules. The law grants "very broad" legislative "protection for religious liberty." Hob......
-
Ammex, Inc. v. Wenk
...harm to others; and (4) whether the public interest would be served by the issuance of an injunction." Bays v. City of Fairborn , 668 F.3d 814, 818–19 (6th Cir. 2012)."When a party seeks a preliminary injunction on the basis of a potential constitutional violation, ‘the likelihood of succes......
-
Prigmore v. City of Redding
...here are not a confined space as in Heffron. There is no fence surrounding the area and no admission fee. (See Bays v. City of Fairborn (6th Cir.2012) 668 F.3d 814, 823–825 [restricting solicitation to booths at festival not narrowly tailored]; Saieg v. City of Dearborn (6th Cir.2011) 641 F......
-
Memphis A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Hargett
...Am. Civil Liberties Union Fund of Mich. v. Livingston County , 796 F.3d 636, 642 (6th Cir. 2015) (quoting Bays v. City of Fairborn , 668 F.3d 814, 818–19 (6th Cir. 2012) ). "These factors are not prerequisites, but are factors that are to be balanced against each other." Overstreet v. Lexin......
Request a trial to view additional results