Bazemore v. Com., 0867-96-1
Decision Date | 26 August 1997 |
Docket Number | No. 0867-96-1,0867-96-1 |
Parties | John Alexis BAZEMORE v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record |
Court | Virginia Court of Appeals |
John W. Brown, Chesapeake, for appellant.
Eugene Murphy, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
Present: COLEMAN and WILLIS, JJ., and HODGES, Senior Judge.
John Alexis Bazemore, appellant, pled guilty to grand larceny. Appellant's participation in the larceny consisted of his having driven a rented truck to the Givens Corporation (Givens), helping others load the truck with all terrain vehicles, motorcycles, and other items, driving the loaded truck to a meeting place, and then driving the truck to a farm where he helped unload it. The total value of the stolen property was approximately $150,000.
On March 21, 1996, appellant was sentenced to ten years in prison, suspended, and ordered to pay restitution of $42,804.46.
On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining the amount of restitution. He argues that the restitution amount should not have included the expenses that Givens incurred in retrieving the stolen items and in determining the amount of its loss. He also contends that because his role in the theft was minor, the court erred in requiring him to pay the full amount of restitution. We hold that the trial court acted within its discretion in determining the amount of and terms and conditions of the restitution to be paid. Therefore, we affirm the trial court's decision.
Code § 19.2-305.1(A) provides that "no person convicted of a crime ... which resulted in property damage or loss, shall be placed on probation or have his sentence suspended unless such person shall make at least partial restitution for such property damage or loss." Restitution for the property damage or loss "is a well established sentencing component, intended to benefit both offender and victim." Frazier v. Commonwealth, 20 Va.App. 719, 721-22, 460 S.E.2d 608, 609 (1995). Sentencing statutes are to be liberally construed to give the trial court broad discretion. See Deal v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 157, 160, 421 S.E.2d 897, 899 (1992).
Code § 19.2-305.1(C) states that "the court, in its discretion, shall determine the amount to be repaid by the defendant and the terms and conditions thereof." The burden of proving the amount of "property damage or loss" for purposes of applying Code § 19.2-305.1(A) is by the preponderance of the evidence. See Alger v. Commonwealth, 19 Va.App. 252, 258, 450 S.E.2d 765, 768 (1994) (citations omitted). The evidence proved that some of the stolen property was recovered. Givens had to pay American Honda $44,901.21 for items Givens had received from American Honda but could not sell because the items were not returned or were damaged. The salvage value of the returned property was $15,469.13. Deducting that amount from the amount paid to American Honda left Givens with a net loss of $29,432.08. Other expenses...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Slusser v. Commonwealth
...preponderance of the evidence." McCullough v. Commonwealth , 38 Va. App. 811, 816, 568 S.E.2d 449 (2002) ; Bazemore v. Commonwealth , 25 Va. App. 466, 468-69, 489 S.E.2d 254 (1997). Restitution may "help make the victim of a crime whole." McCullough , 38 Va. App. at 815, 568 S.E.2d 449. Upo......
-
Slusser v. Commonwealth
... ... Commonwealth , 38 Va.App. 811, 816 (2002); Bazemore ... v. Commonwealth , 25 Va.App. 466, 468-69 (1997) ... Restitution ... ...
-
Widdifield v. Commonwealth, Record No. 3100-02-2 (Va. App. 2/10/2004)
...provided by those statutes and allows trial courts "broad discretion" in their sentencing decisions. Bazemore v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 466, 468, 489 S.E.2d 254, 255 (1997). "[W]hen a statute prescribes a maximum imprisonment penalty and the sentence does not exceed that maximum, the sen......
-
Smith v. Com.
...should employ a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard when determining the amount of restitution, see Bazemore v. Commonwealth, 25 Va.App. 466, 468, 489 S.E.2d 254, 255 (1997). 3. See also United States v. Reese, 998 F.2d 1275, 1282 (5th Cir.1993) (holding that a sentencing court may deter......