Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales
| Decision Date | 03 October 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 06-70717.,06-70717. |
| Parties | Jose Eleazar BAZUA-COTA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Alejandro Garcia, City of Commerce, CA, for petitioner Jose Eleazar Bazua-Cota.
John Hogan, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Before DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SUSAN P. GRABER and RICHARD R. CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Jose Eleazar Bazua-Cota, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") final order of removal. We hold that we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA's discretionary denial of adjustment of status, and we dismiss the petition.
On April 26, 2000, the former Immigration and Naturalization Service issued a Notice to Appear, alleging that Petitioner was subject to removal under Section 237(a)(1)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(C)(i). Petitioner admitted all factual allegations and conceded he was removable as charged. The immigration judge ("IJ") denied his applications for adjustment of status and voluntary departure, as a matter of discretion, and ordered him removed to Mexico. The BIA affirmed the IJ's decision without opinion.
In this petition for review, Petitioner seeks review of the denial of his application for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255.1 However, the decision to deny Petitioner's application for adjustment of status is a discretionary determination, and is therefore unreviewable. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i).
This court retains jurisdiction over petitions for review that raise colorable constitutional claims or questions of law. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 1001 (9th Cir. 2003); Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). In an attempt to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review, Petitioner contends that the BIA and IJ violated his right to due process by failing to properly weigh the equities and hardship before denying his application for adjustment of status. This argument is an abuse of discretion challenge re-characterized as an alleged due process violation. This court has previously held that abuse of discretion challenges to discretionary decisions, even if recast as due process claims, do not constitute colorable constitutional claims. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d at 1271. Accordingly, we grant respondent's motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction.
All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Morales-Izquierdo v. Department of Homeland Sec.
...8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); see Ortega-Cervantes v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1111, 1113 (9th Cir.2007); Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748-49 (9th Cir.2006) (per curiam). Although we do not doubt that the administrative record may on occasion prove vital to reviewing a denial of adjustmen......
-
Garfias–Rodriguez v. Holder
...proceeding to the non-citizen if he has been determined to be eligible for that relief under the statute. See Bazua–Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748 n. 1 (9th Cir.2006) (noting that, under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), we lack jurisdiction to review the Attorney General's discretionary de......
-
Gutierrez v. Holder
...§ 1252(a)(2)(D)). Furthermore, we have noted that errors of law may infect discretionary decisions. See Bazua–Cota v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 747, 748 (9th Cir.2006) (per curiam) (finding jurisdiction to review colorable legal and constitutional claims even where the decision was purely discreti......
-
Rayamajhi v. Whitaker
...BIA's applying the material support bar) only over "colorable constitutional claims or questions of law." Bazua-Cota v. Gonzales , 466 F.3d 747, 748 (9th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition in part.B. De Minimis SupportA noncitizen who has engaged in "terrorist act......