The Board of Education of Jersey City v. Wall
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BODINE, J. |
| Citation | Bd. of Educ. of Jersey City in Hudson County v. Wall, 196 A. 663, 119 N.J.L. 308 (N.J. 1938) |
| Decision Date | 31 January 1938 |
| Docket Number | 245 |
| Parties | THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF JERSEY CITY, IN HUDSON COUNTY, PROSECUTOR, v. MARGARET M. WALL AND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS |
Certiorari by the Board of Education of Jersey City in Hudson County to review action of the State Board of Education directing the Commissioner of Education to direct the Jersey City Board of Education to assign Margaret M. Wall to duty in its schools and to pay her back salary.
Decision affirmed.
Argued January term, 1938, before BODINE, HEHER, and PERSKIE, JJ.
Aloysius McMahon, of Jersey City, for prosecutor. Q. A. Ricciardelli, of Jersey City, and William G. Wall, of New York City, for Margaret M. Wall.
This writ brings up for review the action of the State Board of Education in directing the Commissioner of Education to direct the Jersey City Board of Education to assign Miss Margaret M. Wall to duty in its schools and to pay her the salary to which she was entitled for the period beginning February 1, 1936. Miss Wall possessed a New Jersey state permanent secondary teaching certificate. She was employed by the Jersey City Board of Education as a teacher of mathematics in the high schools of that city from September, 1931, to January, 1936. Her compensation was fixed at the rate of $8 per day in 1931 and 1932, and thereafter at the rate of $6 per day. She was assigned to the Dickinson High School and taught a mathematics class there continuously for three and a half years. In February of 1935 she was transferred to another school, where she taught until January, 1936, when she was informed, by letter, that she would not be assigned to steady employment during the coming year. On February 3, 1936, presenting herself for assignment, she was refused and brought proceedings to set aside the action of the Board of Education in dispensing with her services...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Ed.
...teacher. The dissent cites Downs v. Hoboken Bd. of Ed., 13 N.J.Misc. 853, 181 A. 688 (Sup.Ct.1935), and Jersey City Bd. of Ed. v. Wall, 119 N.J.L. 308, 196 A. 663 (Sup.Ct.1938), as authority for the proposition that it is the nature of the work that determines whether a teacher is working a......
-
Kletzkin v. Board of Educ. of Borough of Spotswood, Middlesex County
...exists notwithstanding the "mere occasional absence of a teacher by reason of illness or excuse." Board of Educ. v. Wall, 119 N.J.L. 308, 309-10, 196 A. 663 (Sup.Ct.1938). Spotswood hired Kletzkin for the school year spanning September 1, 1988, through June 30, 1989, and she started work un......
-
Sayreville Educ. Ass'n, on Behalf of Rucki v. Board of Educ. of Borough of Sayreville, Middlesex County
... ... Law Rep. 523 ... In the Matter of SAYREVILLE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, on Behalf ... of Joann RUCKI, Josephine Marchesi and Deborah ... COUNTY, Respondent-Respondent ... Superior Court of New Jersey, ... Appellate Division ... Argued Feb. 15, 1984 ... Decided April 12, ... Cf. Jersey City ... Bd. of Educ. v. Wall, 119 N.J.L. 308, 196 A. 663 (Sup.Ct.1938); ... ...
-
Schulz v. State Board of Education
...proofs not shown continuous employment for the statutory period, the result would have been otherwise.’ Board of Education of Jersey City v. Wall, 1938, 119 N.J.L. 308, 196 A. 663, 664. But we think that the Downs decision assumes and that the Wall decision concedes the legality of employme......