Beachey & Lawlor v. McWilliams

Decision Date20 May 1915
Docket Number2108.
Citation224 F. 717
PartiesBEACHEY & LAWLOR v. McWILLIAMS.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; Kenesaw M Landis, Judge.

Appellee filed his bill for injunctional and other relief, which was granted. This appeal involves claims 1, 5, 6, 9, and 10 of patent No. 920,490, granted May 4, 1909, to A. C. McWilliams for a panel board for electrical power distribution. The claims read as follows, viz The device is described in the specification, beginning at line 31:

'The apparatus here illustrated is arranged for a three-wire system, although the invention is equally applicable to a two-wire system. The supply mains a, b, c, which are respectively positive, neutral and negative, are adapted to be connected respectively to the positive, neutral and negative bus bars d, f, e, through the switch g in the ordinary manner.
'The parts are mounted on the board A, which may consist of marble or any other suitable insulating material. In the drawings are shown six pairs of meter circuit terminals h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, and h6, each one of which is adapted to have a meter H connected thereto. One of each pair of said terminals is connected to a main, the remaining terminal being connected respectively to one of the stationary conductors i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, which in the present design are mounted on the back of board A, and arranged vertically. A third wire H1 is shown to be connected from the neutral bus bar f to the meter H to furnish a shunt current for operating them in the customary manner.
'Arranged transversely to the meter circuit conductors i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, are the consumption conductors j1, j2, j3, j4, j5, and j6, which in the present design are mounted horizontally on the front side of board A. Each of these last-mentioned conductors mounted on the front of the board is arranged to be fuse-connected to the adjacent terminal of a consumption circuit by means of a shallow binding screw o or other suitable device, which does not penetrate into the board or to the bars f1 or f2 behind, but merely holds the fuse in contact with conductors j1, j2, etc. Said consumption circuits may include lamps, as shown, or any other kind of load. Said bars f1 and f2 are permanently mounted on the board, preferably on the back thereof, and by means of the plugs or screws m which penetrate the board, are adapted to be fuse-connected to the remaining terminals of the pairs of consumption circuit terminals k1, k2, k3, k4, k5, and k6. Thus in each pair of consumption circuit terminals one is connected by a penetrating plug m to one of the mains (the neutral one in this instance), while the remaining terminal is adapted to be permanently fuse-connected by means of a binding screw o to one of the set of permanent consumption circuit conductors j1, j2, j3, j4, j5, or j6. By the word 'permanent' is meant such parts as are intended to be part of the apparatus itself in distinction to the wiring or other parts that are intended to be altered to suit requirements for rearrangement of metering. In consequence of the above, in each meter circuit in this three-wire design one terminal of each pair of meter terminals is connected to either the positive or negative supply main and the other terminal is connected to its respective conductor i1 or i2, etc.; while in each consumption circuit one terminal is connected to the neutral supply main and the other terminal is connected to one of the conductors j1 or j2, etc. Each one of the meter conductors i1, i2, etc., crosses each one of the consumption conductors j1, j2, etc., and therefore in order to complete the circuit through a meter and a consumption circuit it is only necessary to connect one of the conductors i1 or i2, etc., with a conductor j1 or j2, etc. In the present case, provision is made for this by aperturing the board A at the different crossing points to receive plugs or screws n, n, as best shown in Fig. 3.

'In operation, suppose it is desired to throw consumption circuit k2 onto the meter circuit h2, it is merely necessary to put in a plug or screw n at the intersection of conductors i2 and j2 as shown, among other combinations, in Fig. 2. If it is desired to substitute consumption circuit k4 this may be done by removing the aforesaid plug and placing it at the intersection of conductors i2 and j4. All consumption circuits may be connected to meter circuit h2 if desired by putting in a plug at each of the intersections of conductor i2 with the conductors j1, j2, j3, j4, j5, and j6. In a similar manner any consumption circuit may be readily connected to any meter, and as many consumption circuits as desired may be connected to any one meter. It will be noted that no change of wiring of any kind is required, the entire operation consisting in simply inserting or removing one or more plugs as the case may be.'

It was stipulated on the hearing that appellant's device was like that of appellee's. The only errors assigned go to the alleged error of the court in holding that claims 1, 5, 6, 9, and 10 aforesaid were good and valid in law, and in ordering an accounting.

1. A metering panel board having crossed permanent conductors, the conductors running one way being for the meter circuits and those running across them being for the consumption circuits, said conductors being adapted to be electrically connected at their points of crossing, one set of conductors being arranged alternately, so that one conductor leads toward one edge of the board for connection to its circuit, while the conductors on either side thereof lead toward the opposite edge of the board for connection to their circuits.'

5. A metering panel board having parallel conductors adapted for electrical connection to the consumption circuits, said parallel conductors being arranged alternately, so that one conductor leads toward one edge of the board, while the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • May 7, 1923
    ... ... Circuit Judge ... The ... earlier of the patents at bar was sustained in Beachey v ... McWilliams, 224 F. 717, 140 C.C.A. 257, and this ... litigation has been before us on ... ...
  • George Cutter Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co., 259.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 23, 1921
    ...In support of this, the file wrapper of the patent in suit is attached. This was not before the court in the Seventh circuit (224 F. 717, 140 C.C.A. 257). A defense is interposed for the reason that it is asserted that the claims in suit are invalid because they are not supported by an oath......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT