Beall v. STANDARD ELECTRIC COMPANY

Decision Date26 December 1968
Docket NumberNo. 12202.,12202.
Citation404 F.2d 881
PartiesBarbara M. BEALL, Administratrix of the Estate of Edward F. Beall, Deceased, Appellant, v. STANDARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Paul Lee Sweeny, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

John J. Brandt and Charles H. Duff, Arlington, Va. (Duff, Slenker & Brandt, Arlington, Va., on brief) for appellee.

Before BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges, and HUTCHESON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This is an action to recover for death by wrongful act because of injuries received by an employee of a sub-contractor against an alleged third party wrongdoer, an independent contractor performing services on the same building project. Upon a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, the District Court held that the remedy of the Plaintiff was limited to claim under the Virginia Workmen's Compensation Act and judgment was entered accordingly. Sec. 65-37, 65-38 Va.Code (1950). The facts are not in dispute. There being no issue of material fact to be determined and no error of law in the conclusion of the District Court that the Plaintiff was limited to her claim under the Virginia Workmen's Compensation Act, the action of the District Court should be affirmed. Fetig v. Chalkley, 185 Va. 96, 38 S.E.2d 73; Anderson v. Thorington Construction Company, 201 Va. 266, 110 S.E.2d 396; Williams v. E. T. Gresham Company, 201 Va. 457, 111 S.E.2d 498; McCann v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, 177 F.Supp. 909 (E. D.Va.); Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Wallace, 4 Cir., 172 F.2d 802(4); and Turnage v. Northern Virginia Steel Corporation, 4 Cir., 336 F.2d 837(4), Cf. Kramer v. Kramer, 199 Va. 409, 100 S.E. 2d 37.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Wilson v. Fraser
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 29 Enero 1973
    ...v. Biller, 204 Va. 309, 130 S.E.2d 582 (1963); Ferrell v. Beddow, 203 Va. 472, 125 S.E.2d 196 (1962). See also, Beall v. Standard Elec. Co., 404 F.2d 881 (4th Cir. 1968); Doane v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., 209 F.2d 921 (4th Cir. In Feitig v. Chalkley, 185 Va. 96, 38 S.E.2d 73 (1946), t......
  • Wright v. Turner
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • 24 Octubre 2012
    ... ... Oliver, Defendants, and Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Company, DefendantAppellant. 060403958; A144126. Court of Appeals of Oregon ... ...
  • Haynes v. James H. Carr, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 20 Febrero 1969
    ...Construction, 201 Va. 266, 110 S.E.2d 396; Williams v. E. T. Gresham Company, 201 Va. 457, 111 S.E.2d 498; Beall, Admx. v. Standard Electric Co., 404 F.2d 881, E.D.Va., Judge Lewis, November 28, 1967, affirmed; Case No. 12,202, December 26, 1968 (4th Cir.) The last cited case was one to rec......
  • Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rawls, 26154.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 19 Mayo 1969
    ... ... policy restricting coverage to $20,000 as "the total limit of the company's liability * * * as the result of any one accident". Appellant concedes ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT