Beard v. Beard
Decision Date | 23 September 1913 |
Parties | BEARD v. BEARD. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; J.P. Kavanaugh, Judge.
On petition for rehearing. Former decision affirmed.
For former opinion, see 133 P. 797.
R.A. Leiter, of Portland (Griffith, Leiter & Allen and F.J. Lonergan, all of Portland, on the brief), for appellant.
Wallace McCamant, of Portland (Snow & McCamant, of Portland, on the brief), for respondent.
A petition for rehearing has been filed in this case by counsel for defendant on the ground that, if the title to an office is directly and unavoidably in controversy, the court will not grant relief by action of mandamus; and in advocacy thereof, counsel cite the case of State v. Williams, 25 Minn. 340. In that case, the contest was over a political office. The county treasurer of one of the counties of the state had been, during the term of his office as county treasurer, elected to and had accepted the office of representative in the state assembly. The board of commissioners, believing the state Constitution inhibited the treasurer from serving in the dual capacity of county treasurer and representative, appointed another to the office of county treasurer. Possession of the office being withheld by the treasurer, the appointee of the county commissioners sought to compel delivery by mandamus.
In the legal controversy which ensued, the treasurer contended the only question for the court to consider was the title of the office of county treasurer, and that the correct proceeding would be one in the nature of quo warranto, and that mandamus could not be maintained. The court with fitness said ...
To continue reading
Request your trial