Beardsley v. Bridgeport Protestant Orphan Asylum
Decision Date | 03 March 1904 |
Citation | 76 Conn. 660,57 A. 165 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | BEARDSLEY et al. v. BRIDGEPORT PROTESTANT ORPHAN ASYLUM et al. |
Case Reserved from Superior Court, Fairfield County; William T. Elmer, Judge.
Action by the trustees under the will of Bronson B. Beardsley for a construction of the will. Case reserved for the advice of the Supreme Court of Errors. Will construed.
The material parts of the will were as follows:
Twelve legatees, mostly charitable corporations, were then named, and there was added: "The above $24,000 to be paid $2,000 each to the above named objects."
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bassett v. City Bank & trust Co.
... ... Bridgeport-Peoples' Savings Bank, 110 Conn. 397, ... 402, 148 A ... Beers, 61 Conn. 87, 88, 23 A. 717; Beardsley, ... trustee, v. Bridgeport Asylum, 76 Conn. 560, 564, 57 ... ...
-
Tatoian v. Tyler, AC 40736
...it unnecessary to make any change.’ ... Peck v. Searle , 117 Conn. 573, 582, 169 A. 602 (1933) ; see Beardsley v. Bridgeport Protestant Orphan Asylum , 76 Conn. 560, 564, 57 A. 165 (1904) (same); Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co. , 115 Conn. 1, 26, 160 A. 60 (1932) (holding that right to mai......
-
Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York v. Schleussner
... ... Pike, 71 Conn. 521, 530, 42 ... A. 641; Beardsley v. Bridgeport Protestant Orphan ... Asylum, 76 Conn. 561, ... ...
-
Chase Nat. Bank v. Guthrie
...ad litem requires clearer language to that effect than that contained in the will before the court. Beardsley v. Bridgeport Protestant Orphan Asylum, 76 Conn. 560, 564, 57 A. 165. We answer the first question, 'Yes, on September 9, 1942.' The answer to the first question makes it unnecessar......