Bears v. Ambler

Decision Date27 September 1848
Citation9 Pa. 193
PartiesBEARS <I>v.</I> AMBLER.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Sept. 27. ROGERS, J.

The law of the case is accurately stated in the charge. A tenant or occupier is always liable for an injury caused by his neglect, irrespective of any contract between him and the landlord, or owner of the property. So far as the public is concerned, it is nothing to them who may be ultimately liable for repairs. It is the duty of the tenant or occupier in the first instance to keep the ways in such order as not to endanger others, whatever may be his agreement with the landlord or owner of the premises. And this imposes no hardship on him of which he can justly complain, as the landlord and owner is liable on his contract, or his expenditure may be deducted from the rent. Third persons have no means of ascertaining their agreement; moreover the rule of law is, that in the absence of any contract to the contrary, the tenant is bound to keep the premises in repair: Long v. Fitzsimmons, 1 W. & S. 530. The tenant always is; the landlord may, under peculiar circumstances, be liable for an injury sustained by a third person, arising from negligence: Coupland v. Hardingham, 3 Camp. 398; Butterfield v. Forrester, 11 East, 60; and Payne v. Rogers, 2 H. Bl. 349, are full to these points.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • Bruder v. Philadelphia
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1931
    ...entire premises are leased to one tenant the tenant is prima facie liable for injuries occurring to third parties on the premises: Bears v. Ambler, 9 Pa. 193; v. Hotels Co., 284 Pa. 545; Phila. v. Merchant & Evans Co., 296 Pa. 126. The basis of responsibility is a duty arising from the cont......
  • City of New Castle v. Kurtz
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • December 31, 1904
    ...to persons who might be injured by defects arising in the sidewalk for want of repairs while so in possession of the tenants: Bears v. Ambler, 9 Pa. 193; Early Ashworth, 15 W.N.C. 142; Towt v. Philadelphia, 173 Pa. 314; Grier v. Sampson, 27 Pa. 183; Lohr v. Philipsburg Boro., 156 Pa. 246; D......
  • Hanley v. Ryan
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Superior Court
    • February 26, 1926
    ... ... [87 Pa.Super. 10] ... repair when leased or unless they had bound themselves by the ... lease to keep them in repair: Bears v. Ambler, 9 Pa ... 193; Lindstrom v. Penna Co., 212 Pa. 391, 61 A. 940; ... Chroust v. B. & L. Assn., 214 Pa. 179, 63 A. 595; ... Cunningham v ... ...
  • Brown v. White
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • April 21, 1902
    ... ... circumstances be, liable for injury sustained by a third ... person, arising from negligence: Bears v. Ambler, 9 ... Pa. 193; Wunder v. McLean, 134 Pa. 334 ... Plaintiff ... was guilty of contributory negligence: Bruch v ... Phila., ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT