Beauharnais v. Pittsburgh Courier Publishing Co.

Decision Date10 May 1957
Docket NumberNo. 11670.,11670.
PartiesJoseph BEAUHARNAIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The PITTSBURGH COURIER PUBLISHING CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

Joseph Beauharnais, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Leon H. Isaacson, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, and FINNEGAN and SWAIM, Circuit Judges.

DUFFY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff's complaint herein sought damages from defendant for publishing alleged libelous matter in the January 5, 1952 issue of its newspaper, The Pittsburgh Courier. Defendant is a Pennsylvania corporation, and plaintiff a resident of Illinois. Jurisdiction was based upon diversity of citizenship. The record indicates defendant's newspaper is circulated principally among members of the colored race.

Defendant published in its January 5, 1952 issue an article with a large headline "What's Behind the Cicero Riot?" Plaintiff's photograph appeared as part of the background for the headline. Also, as part of said background, was reproduced a circular or pamphlet with the heading "The White Circle League of America", which listed plaintiff as the founder. The circular was worded as follows:

"The White Circle League of America "Founder — Joseph Beauharnais "P. O. Box 531 — Chicago 90, Illinois

"Dedicated to protect and maintain the Dignity, Social Edicts, Customs and rights of the White Race in America.
"Wanted
"One Million Self Respecting White People in Chicago to Unite under the Banner of the White Circle League of America to oppose the National Campaign now on and supported by Truman\'s Infamous Civil Rights Program and some Church Organizations to amalgamate the black and white races with the object of mongrelizing the white race!
"The White Circle League of America is the only articulate white voice in America being raised in protest against negro aggressions and infiltrations into all white neighborhoods. The white people of Chicago Must take advantage of this opportunity to become United. If persuasion and the need to prevent the white race from becoming mongrelized by the negro will not unite us, then the aggressions * * * rapes, robberies, knives, guns and marijuana of the negro, Surely Will.
"The Negro has many national organizations working to push him into the midst of the white people on many fronts. The white race does not have a single organization to work on a National Scale to make it\'s wishes articulate and to assert its natural rights to self-preservation. The White Circle League of America proposes to do the job.
"I wish to be enrolled as a member in The White Circle League of America, and I will do my best to secure ten or more members.

Phone. "My name is Address ................."

After ten spaces for signatures and addresses, the circular concluded with:

"We must awake and protect our white families and neighborhoods before it is too late. Let us work increasingly to conserve the white man\'s dignity and rights in America.

"Joseph Beauharnais."

The words of the article of which plaintiff complained and set forth in his complaint are: "There is a sinister character in Chicago who is more dangerous than the nation's worst gangster. He conducts a vicious and risky business — the promotion of racial hatred, with biased whites as his steady clients. He has never engineered, as far as I know, any outrage like the Valentine Day massacre, but his atrocious activities, if permitted to continue, are sure to cause violent death to hundreds of unsuspecting American citizens who become victims of his bias plots * * * He defies all law and order in the performance of his defaming work. He is a menace to racial harmony in Chicago. This is the introduction to Joseph Beauharnais * * *." "Beauharnais, tall, loose-jointed, shifty-eyed, was dressed in a shoddy blue suit with red and white stripes, probably in answer to his `patriotic' tendencies."

As to damages, plaintiff averred in each Counts 1 and 2 "That by reason of the premises plaintiff has been damaged in the sum of One Million Dollars, for which he prays judgment." As to Count 3, Plaintiff alleged "By reason whereof the plaintiff has been damaged in his standing and reputation, and in his business and social relations, in the community in which he lives and elsewhere, in the sum of One Million Dollars, for which he prays judgment."

The original complaint was filed by plaintiff pro se, but an amendment to the complaint showing diversity of citizenship, was signed by plaintiff and by his attorney, Lawrence M. Fine.

Defendant's answer, among other things, averred the article declared on was published as a news item pertaining to plaintiff's activities as the founder of The White Circle League, and his actions creating and promoting racial discord and hatred. In substance, the answer alleged that the article was fair comment, and that it was written and published without malice. The answer denied that the statements therein were false and untrue and asserted that the article was published in good faith.

The trial in the District Court was before a jury. Defendant moved for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's evidence. The District Court granted the motion, whereupon the jury returned verdict in favor of the defendant. Judgment was entered accordingly from which this appeal was taken.

The law of Illinois is controlling. Spanel v. Pegler, 7 Cir., 160 F.2d 619, 621, 171 A.L.R. 699; Rose v. Indianapolis Newspapers, 7 Cir., 213 F.2d 227, 229. Article 2, § 4 of the Constitution of Illinois, S.H.A., provides:

"Freedom of Speech and Press — Libel.
"Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty; and in all trials for libel, both civil and criminal, the truth, when published with good motives and justifiable ends, shall be a sufficient defense."

Illinois has a statutory definition of libel. Smith-Hurd Ann.Stats. Chap. 38, § 402, provides: "A libel is a malicious defamation, expressed either by printing, or by signs...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Insull v. New York World-Telegram Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 8 Abril 1959
    ...issues in multi-state libel (Dale System, Inc. v. Time, Inc., D.C.Conn.1953, 116 F.Supp. 527; cf. Beauharnais v. Pittsburgh Courier Pub. Co., Inc., 7 Cir., 1957, 243 F.2d 705), and by others that the law of the forum state should govern (see Palmisano v. News Syndicate Co., Inc., D.C.S.D.N.......
  • Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Brautigam, 58-409
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 9 Marzo 1961
    ...Airways v. Tanana Publishing Company, supra, 9 Cir., 1954, 218 F.2d 612, 626-629, and cases there cited; Beauharnis v. Pittsburgh Courier Publishing Co., 7 Cir., 1957, 243 F.2d 705, 708; Caldwell v. Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 5 Cir., 1947, 161 F.2d 333, 336; Mick v. American Dental Ass'n, su......
  • Proesel v. Myers Pub. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 29 Febrero 1960
    ...meaning of the article must be submitted to a jury. Spanel v. Pegler, 7 Cir., 160 F.2d 619, 171 A.L.R. 699; Beauharnais v. Pittsburgh Courier Publishing Co., 7 Cir., 243 F.2d 705; Clark v. Tribune Co., 11 Ill.App.2d 420, 137 N.E.2d 664; Tiernan v. East Shore Newspapers, 1 Ill.App.2d 150, 11......
  • Vantassell-Matin v. Nelson, 89 C 1985.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • 19 Abril 1990
    ...to look to other sentences in the same article to determine if the statement was about the plaintiff (Beauharnais v. Pittsburgh Courier Publishing Co., 243 F.2d 705, 707 (7th Cir.1957)). But that is because a reader of the allegedly defamatory sentence would reasonably have understood each ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT