Beaupre v. Boulevard Billiard Club, 84-209-A
| Decision Date | 05 June 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-209-A,84-209-A |
| Citation | 510 A.2d 415 |
| Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
| Parties | Barbara BEAUPRE Administratrix of the Estate of Chris A. Beaupre, v. BOULEVARD BILLIARD CLUB. ppeal. |
This case comes before the court on appeal from a decision of the trial justice to dismiss this action following a jury-waived trial. On December 8, 1979, Barbara Beaupre (plaintiff), as administratrix of the estate of her son Chris A. Beaupre, filed suit against Henry Tellier d/b/a Boulevard Billiard Club (defendant club). 1 The complaint alleged that the defendant had served alcoholic beverages to Wayne Rivard, who was at the time under eighteen years of age, that Chris Beaupre was riding as a passenger in a car driven by Rivard when they left the club, and that the car was then involved in an accident in which Chris Beaupre was killed. 2 In his decision the trial justice construed Rhode Island's dram shop act, G. L. 1956 (1976 Reenactment) § 3-11-1, as not providing recovery for a wrongful-death action. We reverse.
Testimony at trial established that Chris Beaupre, Wayne Rivard, and Mario Pereira arrived together at defendant club on the evening of October 26, 1979. They all consumed alcoholic beverages despite the fact that Rivard was underage. The bartender who was working on the night of the accident testified that he had looked at Rivard's driver's license before taking his order. Nevertheless, he served Rivard approximately four drinks over a period of about four hours. The trial justice found that by the time that the three boys left defendant club, Rivard was intoxicated, although there was no overt indication of intoxication such as slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, or rowdy behavior. He further determined from the evidence presented that once on the highway, Rivard drove at speeds in excess of sixty miles per hour before crossing over to the wrong side of the road and striking an oncoming vehicle.
The trial justice found that defendant club was liable for the injuries sustained by Pereira and another party injured in the accident under the provisions of § 3-11-1, the dram shop act. He also decided, however, that § 3-11-1 allowed recovery "strictly for personal injuries" and not for wrongful death because there is no specific provision in the statute imposing liability for wrongful death.
The sole question to be addressed now is to what extent § 3-11-1 imposes liability for the actions of an intoxicated person that cause the death of another upon an individual who furnishes the intoxicating beverages in violation of our liquor laws. The plaintiff argues that this liability extends not only to the pain and suffering endured by the injured person but also to a wrongful death. 3
Section 3-11-1 states:
"If any person in a state of intoxication commits any injury to the person or property of another, the person who furnished him with any part of the beverage which occasioned his intoxication, if the same was furnished in violation of this title, shall be liable to the same action by the party injured as the person intoxicated would be liable to; and the party injured, or his or her legal representative, may bring either a joint action against the person intoxicated and the person who furnished the beverage, or a separate action against each." (Emphasis added.)
It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that a statute will not be construed in such a way as to lead to an absurd or unjust result. City of Warwick v. Aptt, 497 A.2d 721 (R.I. 1985); Sugarman v. Lewis, 488 A.2d 709 (R.I. 1985). It is also well established that when a statute is clear and unambiguous on its face, the words must be given their plain and ordinary meaning. Cumberland School Committee v. Harnois, 499 A.2d 752 (R.I. 1985); Cocchini v....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Clymer v. Webster
...to person" under the DSA, allowing recovery thereunder. See Fraternal Order of Eagles, 364 N.W.2d at 222; Beaupre v. Boulevard Billiard Club, 510 A.2d 415, 416 (R.I.1986). We agree with their approach. The DSA allows a person to recover damages for personal injuries that result from a vendo......
-
Bongiorno v. D.I.G.I., Inc.
...324, 122 N.Y.S.2d 604; Maras v. Bertholdt, 126 Ill.App.3d 876, 81 Ill.Dec. 728, 736-737, 467 N.E.2d 599, 607-608; Beaupre v. Boulevard Billiard Club, 510 A.2d 415 [R.I.] ). We note, moreover, that funeral expenses have been held to be recoverable under a Dram Shop theory of liability ( see,......
-
Pardey v. Boulevard Billiard Club, 84-373-Appeal
...accident within Rhode Island's borders would be inconsistent with legislative intent. As this court stated in Beaupre v. Boulevard Billiard Club, 510 A.2d 415 (R.I. 1986) "Section 3-11-1 represents the current trend in our society to deal with the serious problem of alcohol-related injury b......
-
Adkins v. Uncle Bart's, Inc.
...death and dramshop actions are "wholly unrelated both as to scope and purpose"). ¶ 38 The plaintiffs rely on Beaupre v. Boulevard Billiard Club, 510 A.2d 415 (R.I.1986), where the court held that recovery for wrongful death could be had under that state's Dramshop Act. However, that Dramsho......