Beccio v. CAM Const. Co., 100
| Decision Date | 01 September 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 100,100 |
| Parties | Vincent J. BECCIO v. CAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al. , |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Certiorari to Court of Special Appeals (Circuit Court for Baltimore City); Clifton J. Gordy, Jr., Judge.
Janet D. Bacot, Arnold, Bacot, Gay & Tingle, P.A., on brief, Baltimore, for petitioner.
Rudolph L. Rose, P.C., P. Matthew Darby, Severn E.S. Miller, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on brief, Baltimore, for respondent.
Argued before MURPHY, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI and ROBERT M. BELL, JJ.
For reasons stated by Judge Diana G. Motz for the Court of Special Appeals in CAM Construction v. Beccio, 92 Md.App. 452, 608 A.2d 1264 (1992), the judgment is affirmed.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Barnes v. Children's Hosp.
...Md. 447, 455, 385 A.2d 1179 (1978); CAM Construction Co. v. Beccio, 92 Md.App. 452, 460, 608 A.2d 1264 (1992), aff'd per curiam, 329 Md. 600, 620 A.2d 939 (1993). Upon consideration of all the circumstances, there must be a "causal connection" between the conditions under which the work was......
-
Youngblud v. Fallston Supply
...the evidence in this case with that in CAM Construction Co., Inc. v. Beccio, 92 Md.App. 452, 608 A.2d 1264 (1992), aff'd, 329 Md. 600, 620 A.2d 939 (1993), [I]n the case sub judice, the Employer has convinced me that there was absolutely nothing [about the staircase] that contributed in any......