Beck v. United States
Decision Date | 07 October 2020 |
Docket Number | No. 1:20-CV-67 SNLJ,1:20-CV-67 SNLJ |
Parties | LONNIE BECK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri |
This matter is before the Court on a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct sentence by Lonnie Beck, a person in federal custody. On November 27, 2018, Beck pled guilty before this Court to the offense of Felon in Possession of a Firearm (Count I), Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine (Count 2) and Possession of a Firearm in Relation to a Drug Trafficking Crime (Count 3). On March 19, 2019, this Court sentenced Beck to the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 18 months on Count I and II, and 60 months on Count III, to run consecutive for an aggregate term of 78 months imprisonment. Beck's § 2255 motion is fully briefed and ripe for disposition.
On July 10, 2018, Lonnie L. Beck (Beck) was charged by Indictment in the Eastern District of Missouri in Count I with being convicted felon in possession of a firearm, in Count II with possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1), and in Count III with possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c)(1)(A), and punishable under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). (DCD 1)
On November 27, 2018, Beck executed a plea agreement, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A), wherein he agreed to plead guilty to all three counts charged in the Indictment. Moreover, the United States agreed that no further federal prosecution would be brought in this District relative to the defendant's possession of a firearm and methamphetamine on May 29, 2018, of which the Government was aware at that time. (Doc. 31, Plea Ag., pp. 1-2)
In the Plea Agreement, the parties agreed that as to Count I, Felon in Possession of a Firearm, the base offense level was found in Section 2K2.1 and depended on the nature of the firearm, the defendant's criminal history and other factors therein. As to Count II, Possession with Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine, the parties agreed that the base offense level was 24, as found in Section 2D1.1(c)(8). The parties agreed that the quantity of mixture or substance containing methamphetamine for which the defendant was accountable, including relevant conduct, was more than fifty grams, but less than 200 grams. As to Count III, the minimum term of imprisonment of five years imposed for Count III shall run consecutively to the terms of imprisonment imposed for Counts I and II. (Doc. 31, Plea Ag., pp. 7-8)
In the Plea Agreement, Beck agreed that the facts in his case were as follows:
On November 27, 2018, Beck appeared with his attorney and pled guilty to Counts I, II and III of the Indictment, charging him in Count I with being convicted felon in possession of a firearm, in Count II with possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation ofTitle 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1), and in Count III with possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c)(1)(A), and punishable under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). (PSR, ¶ 1, DCD 30, 49)1
Relative to Chapter 3 Adjustments, it was also agreed that Beck should receive three levels for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to Section 3E1.1 (a) and (b). (Plea Ag., p. 8)
During his change of plea hearing, when asked if he was satisfied with the way his lawyer had handled his case, Beck replied "Yes, sir." (Plea Tr., p. 4) Beck acknowledged to the Court that his lawyer had investigated the case to his satisfaction. When asked if his attorney had done everything he had asked him to do, Beck responded, "Yes, sir." (Plea Tr., p. 4) When asked if he had any "gripes or complaints whatsoever," Beck responded, "No, sir." (Plea Tr., p. 6) In the Plea Agreement, Beck represented that he was satisfied with the representation he had received from his lawyer.
The defendant is fully satisfied with the representation received from defense counsel. The defendant has reviewed the Government's evidence and discussed the Government's case and all possible defenses and defense witnesses with defense counsel. Defense counsel has completely and satisfactorily explored all areas which the defendant has requested relative to the Government's case and any defenses.
Pursuant to the Agreement, Beck also agreed to "waive all rights to appeal all non-jurisdictional, non-sentencing issues, including, but not limited to, any issues relating to pretrialmotions, discovery, the guilty plea, the constitutionality of the statutes to which defendant is pleading guilty, and whether defendant's...
To continue reading
Request your trial