Beckham v. Lefferts General Hospital
Decision Date | 08 March 1971 |
Citation | 320 N.Y.S.2d 263,36 A.D.2d 726 |
Parties | John BECKHAM, as administrator, etc., Respondent, v. LEFFERTS GENERAL HOSPITAL et al., Defendants, and Edward Harris Rosenthal, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Joel H. Lichtenstein, James G. Eberz, New York City, for Edward Harris Rosenthal.
Before RABIN, P.J., and HOPKINS, MUNDER, MARTUSCELLO and LATHAM, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, defendant Rosenthal appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 24, 1968 and entered in Kings County, which (1) denied his motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint and (2) granted plaintiff's cross application to compelappellant to accept the complaint.
Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; appellant's motion granted and complaint dismissed as to appellant, with leave to plaintiff to move at Special Term upon proper papers to vacate the dismissal, if plaintiff be so advised; and plaintiff's cross application denied.
In the absence of proof, made under oath by one with knowledge, that the...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Barasch v. Micucci
...the claim against the defendant has legal merit (e. g., De Stefano v. Nash, 40 A.D.2d 1010, 338 N.Y.S.2d 919; Beckham v. Lefferts Gen. Hosp., 36 A.D.2d 726, 320 N.Y.S.2d 263; see Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinneys Cons.Laws of N.Y., Book 7B, CPLR 3012, pp. 590-591). This requirement m......
-
O'Halloran v. Eller
...motion (Melfi v. Nash, 40 A.D.2d 1017, 339 N.Y.S.2d 119; Wilkening v. Fogarty, 40 A.D.2d 1031, 338 N.Y.S.2d 985; Beckham v. Lefferts Gen. Hosp., 36 A.D.2d 726, 320 N.Y.S.2d 263). ...
-
Simons v. Sanford Plaza, Inc.
...to serve their complaint in the absence of a successful motion by them to be relieved of their default (Beckham v. Lefferts Gen. Hosp., 36 A.D.2d 726, 320 N.Y.S.2d 263). They also failed to submit a proper affidavit of merit in opposition to the motion (Powell v. Becker Truck Renting Corp.,......
-
Arnold v. General Motors Corp. (Cadillac Division)
...thereof was unreasonable and unjustified (see McKay v. Smithtown Gen. Hosp., 42 A.D.2d 594, 345 N.Y.S.2d 78; Beckham v. Lefferts Gen. Hosp., 36 A.D.2d 726, 320 N.Y.S.2d 263). Therefore, it was an improvident exercise of Special Term's discretion to condition the grant of defendants' motion ......
-
IX. APPEALS APPEALS
...5511.[2349] CPLR 5015(a); De Stefano v. Nash, 40 A.D.2d 1010, 1010, 338 N.Y.S.2d 919 (2d Dep't 1972); Beckham v. Lefferts Gen. Hosp., 36 A.D.2d 726, 726, 320 N.Y.S.2d 263 (2d Dep't 1971); see David D. Siegel, McKinney's Practice Commentary, CPLR 3012 (2005).[2350] See, e.g., Benitez v. Olso......