Beckles v. United States
| Decision Date | 30 June 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 14–7390.,14–7390. |
| Citation | 135 S.Ct. 2928 (Mem),576 U.S. 1082,192 L.Ed.2d 973 |
| Parties | Travis BECKLES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 2551, ––– L.Ed.2d ––– (2015).
Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
Justice ALITO concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case: Following the recommendation of the Solicitor General, the Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 2551, – ––L.Ed.2d –––– (2015). In holding this petition and now in vacating and remanding the decision below in this case, the Court has not differentiated between cases in which the petitioner would be entitled to relief if the Court held (as it now has) that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), is void for vagueness and cases in which relief would not be warranted for a procedural reason. On remand, the Court of Appeals should understand that the Court's disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner's entitlement to relief.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Barton
...that his Motion must meet either of these categories before the Court can consider it, as his Motion states, "Please see Beckles v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2928, U.S. No. 15-8544, argued 11/28/16, certiorari. The exaggeration and out-of-context issue(s) raised in Beckles apply, not any si......