Beckles v. United States, 15–8544.

Decision Date27 June 2016
Docket NumberNo. 15–8544.,15–8544.
Citation195 L.Ed.2d 838,136 S.Ct. 2510 (Mem)
Parties Travis BECKLES, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
105 cases
  • United States v. Blount
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas
    • July 14, 2017
    ...sentence due to the ACCA, so Johnson is inapplicable. (Doc. 103, pp. 4, 15-16) Blount did recognize that Beckles v. United States, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 2510, 195 L.Ed.2d 838 (2016) would have a bearing on his claim. (Doc. 110, p. 4) The Supreme Court granted certiorari in that case to addres......
  • Beckles v. United States
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 6, 2017
    ...Johnson 's vagueness holding applies to the residual clause in § 4B1.2(a) of the Guidelines,2 we granted certiorari. 579 U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2510, 195 L.Ed.2d 838 (2016). Because the United States, as respondent, agrees with petitioner that the Guidelines are subject to vagueness challenge......
  • United States v. Savage
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • January 12, 2017
    ...residual clause, the recent decisions in Beckles v. U . S . , 616 Fed.Appx. 415 (11th Cir. 2015) [, cert. granted , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2510, 195 L.Ed.2d 838 (2016) ] and Denson v. U . S . , 804 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2015) [, cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 1214, 194 L.Ed.2d 217......
  • United States v. Matchett
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • September 13, 2016
    ...Indeed, the Supreme Court will soon consider whether the guidelines can be vague in Beckles v. United States , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2510, 195 L.Ed.2d 838 (2016), and its decision could settle the issue once and for all. Rehearing Matchett en banc would not be a wise use of our resources......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT