Beckworth v. State
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | WELCH, Judge. |
| Citation | Beckworth v. State, 190 So.3d 527 (Ala. Crim. App. 2009) |
| Decision Date | 01 May 2009 |
| Docket Number | CR–07–0051. |
| Parties | Rex Allen BECKWORTH v. STATE of Alabama. |
John C. Neiman, Jr., Birmingham (withdrew 05/18/2009); Sydney Albert Smith, Elba (withdrew 06/12/2009); and Daniel Gary Hamm, Montgomery, for appellant.
Troy King, atty. gen., and Michael A. Nunnelley (withdrew 06/30/2008), J. Clayton Crenshaw, and Thomas Govan, asst. attys. gen., for appellee.
In 2002 Rex Allen Beckworth was convicted of capital murder, a violation of § 13A–5–40(a)(4), Ala.Code 1975, and was sentenced to death. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed Beckworth's conviction and death sentence. Beckworth v. State, 946 So.2d 490 (Ala.Crim.App.2005). The Alabama Supreme Court denied certiorari review, 946 So.2d 490 (Ala.2006), as did the United States Supreme Court, 549 U.S. 1120, 127 S.Ct. 936, 166 L.Ed.2d 717 (2007). A certificate of judgment was issued on June 23, 2006. On June 22, 2007, Beckworth filed a petition pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., seeking postconviction relief. The case involving Beckworth's petition was assigned to Judge Edward Jackson, who had presided over Beckworth's trial. On August 13, 2007, the State of Alabama filed its answer to Beckworth's petition. On August 16, 2007, the circuit court entered an order dismissing the petition. On September 6, 2007, Beckworth filed a motion to reconsider the dismissal and a motion for leave to amend the petition. On September 24, 2007, the trial court issued an order purporting to grant Beckworth 30 days to amend the Rule 32 petition. This appeal follows.
The underlying facts in this case are stated in this Court's opinion on direct appeal.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Yeomans v. State
...]; Davis [v. State, 44 So.3d 1118 (Ala.Crim.App.2009) ]; Windsor [v. State, 89 So.3d 805 (Ala.Crim.App.2009) ]; Beckworth [v. State, 190 So.3d 527 (Ala.Crim.App.2009) ]; Smith v. State, 71 So.3d 12 (Ala.Crim.App.2008) ; Ferguson v. State, 13 So.3d 418, 444–45 (Ala.Crim.App.2008).“.... “McWh......
-
Spencer v. State
...to plead how he was prejudiced by counsel's failure to use his peremptory strikes to remove these three jurors. See Beckworth v. State, [190 So.3d 527 (Ala.Crim.App.2009) ]. Lee did not allege that any of the jurors were actually biased against him and, unlike [State v.] Terry, [601 So.2d 1......
-
Thompson v. State
...not hold [an evidentiary hearing], it was not required to make specific findings of facts as to each claim.’ Beckworth v. State, 190 So. 3d 527, 546-47 (Ala. Crim. App. 2009). ‘[R]ule 32.9(d), Ala. R. Crim. P., requires findings of fact only if an evidentiary hearing is held. Findings are n......
-
McWhorter v. Dunn
...when he filed his Amended Rule 32 Petition and in 2011 when the state appellate court ruled on the claim. See Beckworth v. State, 190 So. 3d 527, 541 (Ala. Crim. App. 2009) (holding that a summarily dismissed Brady claim was procedurally barred because petitioner "failed to include in his p......