Bedell v. Schiedler
Decision Date | 28 September 1988 |
Docket Number | C-10928 |
Citation | 93 Or.App. 214,761 P.2d 552 |
Parties | Helen Jolaine BEDELL, Appellant, v. R. SCHIEDLER, Superintendent, Oregon Women's Correctional Institution, Respondent. 87-; CA A46980. |
Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
John E. Storkel, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.
Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before WARDEN, P.J., and DEITS and GRABER, JJ.
Petitioner, an inmate at Oregon Women's Correctional Center (OWCC), appeals the dismissal of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 We affirm.
Petitioner contends that her conditions of confinement are unlawful, because OWCC's failure to provide proper ventilation and air circulation poses serious health problems for her. Petitioner's replication, see ORS 34.670, sets forth the causes of the alleged improper ventilation and circulation and then alleges:
She does not allege that she did not suffer the ailments before her confinement at OWCC, that her physical ailments are linked medically to the lack of ventilation and circulation of air or that she has sought medical treatment that has failed to alleviate her ailments. She therefore has failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a basis for habeas corpus relief. Scott v. Cupp, 55 Or.App. 23, 637 P.2d 173 (1981).
AFFIRMED.
1 The trial court held that the challenged conditions of confinement do not require immediate judicial intervention and that petitioner had reasonable alternative legal remedies available. See Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or. 21, 581 P.2d 934 (1978).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bedell v. Schiedler
...She therefore has failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a basis for habeas corpus relief." Bedell v. Schiedler, 93 Or.App. 214, 215, 761 P.2d 552 (1988). We first examine the statutory framework for habeas corpus actions. Habeas corpus proceedings are governed by ORS 34.31......
-
Lane v. Maass
...the plaintiff "has failed to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a basis for habeas corpus relief." Bedell v. Schiedler, 93 Or.App. 214, 215, 761 P.2d 552 (1988). We reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals, holding that the plaintiff did in fact "allege sufficient specific f......
-
Bedell v. Schiedler
...75 767 P.2d 75 307 Or. 245 Bedell (Helen Jlaine) v. Schiedler NOS. A46980, S35677 Supreme Court of Oregon DEC 20, 1988 93 Or.App. 214, 761 P.2d 552 ...