Begay v. First Nat. Bank of Farmington

Decision Date23 June 1972
Docket Number837,Nos. 835,s. 835
PartiesJack BEGAY and Mable Begay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FARMINGTON, Defendant-Appellee. George KELLYWOOD and Bessie Kellywood, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeals of New Mexico
Richard W. Hughes, Richard B. Collins, Jr., Michael R. Serwatka, Paul Biderman, John P. Gascoyne, Richard Fahey, Shiprock, Attorneys for Appellants (Nos. 835 and 837)
OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

The Begay and Kellywood cases were consolidated on appeal.

BEGAY

Begay sued the First National Bank of Farmington for unlawful repossession and conversion of a pickup truck by the bank. The bank moved to dismiss the complaint. The parties stipulated and agreed to the findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court found that the 'stipulated findings of fact and conclusion (sic) of law should be and they are hereby adopted' and ordered that the 'case be and it is hereby dismissed.'

Begay now contends that the district court erroneously concluded, (1) that 7 Navajo Tribal Code §§ 307--309 is not material to and did not affect the rights of the parties with regard to repossession and sale of the pickup; (2) that Begay's complaint did state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

The stipulated findings became the facts of this case on appeal. We note that the findings support the trial court's conclusions of law. Therefore, no error was committed in the trial court.

Affirmed.

KELLYWOOD

George and Bessie Kellywood are Navajo Indians, who reside on the Navajo Reservation in the State of New Mexico. They sued the First National Bank in Albuquerque for unlawful repossession on Indian land of a pickup truck, and conversion thereof. The parties stipulated that there were two issues to be decided, (1) whether the plaintiffs' amended and supplemental complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and (2) whether a permament injunction, restraining and enjoining the defendant from selling the pickup truck which was repossessed, should be issued. They further stipulated that the matter would be submitted to the court for decision based upon the pleadings and affidavits of the parties and oral testimony of one of the bank's witnesses. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. Kellywoods appeal.

We affirm.

Kellywood did not attack any of the findings of fact or conclusions of law. Findings of fact by the court not objected to are facts upon which the case rests on appeal. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, 76 N.M. 509, 417 P.2d 521 (1966); Hopkins v. Martinez, 73 N.M. 275, 387 P.2d 853 (1963). Failure to find facts on a material point in issue will be regarded on appeal as a finding against the party having the burden of proof. Hopkins v. Martinez, supra.

Kellywood states in the brief in chief:

It should be noted that what is in dispute here is a very narrow issue, namely, the procedure which the defendant should have followed in taking possession of property which was subject to a security interest. There is no question raised about the validity of the contract which created the security interest, or about the validity of the security interest itself, or about the secured party's right to repossess upon default. Plaintiff concedes that a dispute over these matters would properly be decided according to the law of New Mexico. The only issue here is the manner of repossession, and it is plaintiff's contention that this issue should be decided according to the law of the situs at the time of repossession. (Emphasis added).

A. Material Findings and Conclusions of the Trial Court.

A summary of the findings made by the trial...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Cutnose
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • 30 d3 Outubro d3 1974
    ...connection with the pretrial motions. State v. Lucero, 82 N.M. 367, 482 P.2d 70 (Ct.App.1971); compare Begay v. First National Bank of Farmington,84 N.M. 83, 499 P.2d 1005 (Ct.App.1972). filed a second motion attacking the court's jurisdiction on April 13, 1973. The trial court's order deny......
  • Worthey v. Sedillo Title Guaranty, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 20 d5 Julho d5 1973
    ... ... and adjudicated that the prior lien constituted the first, prior and paramount lien upon the real estate, and ... 671, 427 P.2d 29 (1967); Begay v. First National Bank of Farmington, 84 N.M. 83, 499 P.2d ... ...
  • Begay v. Foutz & Tanner, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • 23 d2 Outubro d2 1979
    ... ...         John E. Schindler, Palmer & Frost, Farmington", for defendant-appellant ...         WALTERS, Judge ...   \xC2" ...         We will discuss the Begay case first because defendant's method of asserting its creditor's right upon default ... Farmers State Bank v. Otten, 87 S.D. 161, 204 N.W.2d 178, 180 (1973) ... ...
  • Loco Credit Union v. Reed
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 14 d5 Dezembro d5 1973
    ... ... owned jointly by Fred and Janet; Loco had a valid first lien against one-half thereof; and Janet was entitled to ... on Totten trusts, tentative trusts, or savings bank trusts, as they are usually called, see 1 Scott on Trusts, ... Williams, 76 N.M. 509, 416 P.2d 521 (1966); Begay v. First National Bank Of Farmington, 84 N.M. 83, 499 P.2d ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT